Fracture resistance of roots filled with three different obturation techniques

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridARSLAN, HAKAN/0000-0003-4890-1062
dc.authoridKeleş, Ali/0000-0003-2835-767X
dc.authorwosidARSLAN, HAKAN/AAA-7939-2022
dc.authorwosidKeleş, Ali/J-5897-2015
dc.contributor.authorTopcuoglu, Huseyin-Sinan
dc.contributor.authorArslan, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorKeles, Ali
dc.contributor.authorKoseoglu, Mustafa
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:35:54Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:35:54Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The aim of this study was to compare in vitro root fracture resistance following root canal filling with AH 26 using lateral condensation, BeeFill, and Thermafil techniques. Study Design: Eighty extracted human mandibular premolars with similar dimensions were selected. In order to standardize the roots, measurements were taken in two separate regions of the teeth-at the cemento-enamel junction and 8 mm apically from the junction-buccolingual as well as mesiodistal for every tooth. Teeth were then randomly divided into five groups (n=16). With the exception of the non-prepared group (Group 1), instrumentation was done in all groups. In group 2, instrumentation but no filling was performed; in group 3, the obturation was done with AH 26 + gutta-percha; in group 4, with AH 26 + BeeFill and in group 5, AH 26 + a Thermafil obturator was used. All the roots were mounted vertically in copper rings and filled with acrylic resin, exposing 8 mm of the coronal part. A universal testing machine was used for the strength test. Results: The results were analyzed using the one-way ANOVA test. The significance between the groups was tested with Temhane's T2 test. The results indicate that instrumentation of root canals had a significant effect on fracture resistance (p<0.05). In addition, there were no differences between the root canal obturation techniques; furthermore, these techniques did not create a statistically important resistance to vertical fracture (p>0.05). Conclusions: The results suggest that instrumentation of root canals significantly weakens the tooth structure to fracture and the root canal obturation techniques that are used are not able to form reinforcement.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4317/medoral.17518
dc.identifier.endpageE532en_US
dc.identifier.issn1698-6946
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid22143717en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84861438438en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpageE528en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.17518
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/95666
dc.identifier.volume17en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000304343300030en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMedicina Oral S Len_US
dc.relation.ispartofMedicina Oral Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAH 26en_US
dc.subjectobturation techniqueen_US
dc.subjectvertical fractureen_US
dc.titleFracture resistance of roots filled with three different obturation techniquesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu