Is More Cortical Bone Decortication Effective on Guided Bone Augmentation?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridGuler, Cigdem/0000-0002-2581-9050
dc.authoridVardı, Nigar/0000-0003-0576-1696
dc.authorwosidGuler, Cigdem/KPA-0490-2024
dc.authorwosidalan, hilal/ABH-9301-2020
dc.authorwosidVardı, Nigar/C-9549-2018
dc.contributor.authorAcar, Ahmet Hueseyin
dc.contributor.authorAlan, Hilal
dc.contributor.authorOzgur, Cem
dc.contributor.authorVardi, Nigar
dc.contributor.authorAsutay, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorGuler, Cigdem
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:43:09Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:43:09Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to evaluate the possible effect of more cortical bone decortication (CBD) on guided bone augmentation. A total of 16 New Zealand rabbits and 32 titanium domes were used. No cortical bone decortication was applied to the control group and in the study groups, the cortical bones were decorticated with a round burr (Group A: 1 hole with bleeding, Group B: 5 holes with bleeding, Group C: a thin layer of compact bone was completely removed with no bleeding). Then 2 titanium domes were placed on the calvarium of each rabbit with hydroxyapatite/beta-tricalcium phosphate. After 3 months, the animals were sacrificed and specimens were sent for histological and histomorphometric analysis. Histological and histomorphometric analysis showed that bone decortication with burr significantly increased new bone regeneration in all the experimental groups compared with the control group (P<0.05). No statistically significant difference was determined between the study groups. In conclusion, CBD, which has no negative impact on surgery, has a positive effect on guided bone augmentation. However, a greater amount of CBD does not have a greater effect.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/SCS.0000000000002932
dc.identifier.endpage1883en_US
dc.identifier.issn1049-2275
dc.identifier.issn1536-3732
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.pmid27763979en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85018598832en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1879en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000002932
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/97798
dc.identifier.volume27en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000386352100122en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Craniofacial Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBone decortication rateen_US
dc.subjectguided bone augmentationen_US
dc.subjecthydroxyapatiteen_US
dc.subjectbeta-tricalcium phosphateen_US
dc.subjecttitanium membraneen_US
dc.titleIs More Cortical Bone Decortication Effective on Guided Bone Augmentation?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu