Comparative analysis of three different filling techniques and the effects of experimental internal resorptive cavities on apical microleakage

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorscopusid8731395200
dc.authorscopusid24544570800
dc.authorscopusid55682459500
dc.authorscopusid56033272800
dc.authorscopusid55867004100
dc.authorscopusid9534338700
dc.contributor.authorKeles A.
dc.contributor.authorAhmetoglu F.
dc.contributor.authorOcak M.S.
dc.contributor.authorDayi B.
dc.contributor.authorBozkurt A.
dc.contributor.authorOrucoglu H.
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:02:12Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:02:12Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the sealing abilities of three different gutta-percha techniques in experimentally defective roots (EDR) and non-defective roots (NR). Materials and Methods: Sixty canine teeth were divided into six groups of ten; Group 1, NR + cold lateral condensation (CLC); Group 2, EDR + LC; Group 3, NR + BeeFill; Group 4, EDR + BeeFill; Group 5, NR + Thermafil; and Group 6, EDR + Thermafil. Apical leakage was measured using a computerized fluid filtration meter with a laser system. Results: Statistical analysis revealed that the CLC demonstrated more microleakage in the EDR than in the NR (P < 0.01). Thermafil demonstrated more microleakage in the NR than in the EDR (P < 0.01). No statistically significant differences were found between the BeeFill groups (P > 0.05). Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that internal resorptive cavities can affect the apical sealing properties of different root canal filling techniques, with Thermafil ensuring the lowest apical microleakage. © 2014 Dental Investigations Society.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4103/1305-7456.126237
dc.identifier.endpage37en_US
dc.identifier.issn1305-7456
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84893833467en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage32en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.126237
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/91508
dc.identifier.volume8en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Dentistryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectInternal Resorptionen_US
dc.subjectMicroleakageen_US
dc.subjectRoot Canal Filling Techniquesen_US
dc.titleComparative analysis of three different filling techniques and the effects of experimental internal resorptive cavities on apical microleakageen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu