Recent attestations of new glume wheat in Turkey: a reassessment of its role in the reconstruction of Neolithic agriculture

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridULAS, BURHAN/0000-0002-0031-7222
dc.authoridFIORENTINO, Girolamo/0000-0001-8480-891X
dc.authorwosidULAS, BURHAN/R-3391-2017
dc.authorwosidFIORENTINO, Girolamo/F-3769-2012
dc.contributor.authorUlas, Burhan
dc.contributor.authorFiorentino, Girolamo
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:49:04Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:49:04Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractStudies of the origins of agriculture in the Near East have revealed that the eight plant species known as Founder Crops, i.e. emmer, einkorn, barley, lentils, peas, chickpeas, bitter vetch and flax, derived from annual self-pollinating wild predecessors, were all domesticated in roughly the same period. Recent research however has prompted new debate on whether there are really only eight Founder Crops species in the Near East. Interest has focused on new glume wheat (NGW), a Triticum species identified for the first time by de Moulins at the Pre-Pottery Neolithic B (PPNB) site of Caferhoyuk in Eastern Anatolia. After this identification, similar remains were identified in Neolithic and Bronze Age sites in Greece and were named new glume wheat. Recently, the remains of NGW spikelet bases have been documented in two settlements in Turkey: Yumuktepe (Cilicia) and Yenikapi (eastern Thrace). The remains of NGW spikelet bases from these two settlements underwent morphobiometric analysis in order to contribute to discussion of the morphological character of NGW spikelets. In addition, a whole NGW spikelet from Yenikapi was analysed, contributing to discussion of the morphological features of NGW caryopses. At the same time, these attestations open up new debate not only on its large-scale presence in Anatolia but also its origins and the ways and routes by which it spread to other regions. In this study, the two basic models of domestication and geographical expansion, i.e. the rapid transition model and the protracted model, are assessed on the basis of the new evidence of NGW in Turkey and the relationship with other European sites where it is attested.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00334-020-00807-w
dc.identifier.endpage701en_US
dc.identifier.issn0939-6314
dc.identifier.issn1617-6278
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85094810033en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage685en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-020-00807-w
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/99607
dc.identifier.volume30en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000583127800001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofVegetation History and Archaeobotanyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectNeolithic agricultureen_US
dc.subject“ New” glume wheaten_US
dc.subjectAnatoliaen_US
dc.subjectEuropeen_US
dc.subjectMorphobiometric analysesen_US
dc.titleRecent attestations of new glume wheat in Turkey: a reassessment of its role in the reconstruction of Neolithic agricultureen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu