Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Evaluation of the Eustachian Tube in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate Compared With Normal Controls
dc.authorid | duman, suayip burak/0000-0003-2552-0187 | |
dc.authorid | BAYRAKDAR, Ibrahim Sevki/0000-0001-5036-9867 | |
dc.authorwosid | duman, suayip burak/ABE-5878-2020 | |
dc.authorwosid | BAYRAKDAR, Ibrahim Sevki/Y-1232-2019 | |
dc.contributor.author | Duman, Suayip Burak | |
dc.contributor.author | Bayrakdar, Ibrahim Sevki | |
dc.contributor.author | Yasa, Yasin | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-04T20:47:23Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-08-04T20:47:23Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.department | İnönü Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | The authors compared the morphological features of the Eustachian tube (ET) between patients with cleft lip and palate (CL/P) and normal controls using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). CBCT images of 51 CL/P patients (28 males and 23 females, mean age: 18.5 +/- 8.0 years) and a control group of 52 patients (22 males and 30 females, mean age: 25.23 +/- 10.65 years) were retrospectively evaluated. The Eustachian tube angle (ETA), Eustachian tube length (EL), and auditory tube angle (ATA) were measured on CBCT images. The ETA, EL, and ATA in the CL/P and normal control groups were 30.4 +/- 6.2 and 36.7 +/- 7.5 degrees; 24.7 +/- 3.7 and 27.7 +/- 4.3 mm; and 142.4 +/- 7.8 and 136.3 +/- 4.1 degrees, respectively. All between-group differences were statistically significant (allP < 0.05). There were no significant between-gender differences in either group (allP > 0.05). Continuous variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test. The morphological features of the ET, measured via multiplanar reconstruction CBCT, differed between CL/P patients and normal controls. CBCT can be used to evaluate ET morphological features. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006290 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 1152 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1049-2275 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1536-3732 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 32149976 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85086052832 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q2 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 1149 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000006290 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11616/99341 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 31 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000563343600106 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q4 | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Craniofacial Surgery | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Auditory tube angle | en_US |
dc.subject | cleft lip and palate | en_US |
dc.subject | cone-beam computed tomography | en_US |
dc.subject | eustachian tube | en_US |
dc.title | Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Evaluation of the Eustachian Tube in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate Compared With Normal Controls | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |