Fracture strength of different veneers on polyetheretherketone (PEEK) frameworks in implant-supported single crowns

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridTekin, Samet/0000-0001-8883-8307
dc.authoriddemirci, fatih/0000-0002-8744-5592
dc.authorwosidTekin, Samet/GNH-3187-2022
dc.authorwosiddemirci, fatih/ABG-8682-2020
dc.contributor.authorTekin, Samet
dc.contributor.authorDemirci, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorBakir, Metin
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:52:16Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:52:16Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate the fracture strength of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) single crowns veneered with different materials produced by computer-aided design (CAD)-computer-aided manufacture (CAM) after aging. Methods: 60 stainless-steel master dies were prepared with a 1 mm-wide deep chamfer. Sixty PEEK frameworks were produced with a CAD-CAM system for the right maxillary first molar tooth on the dies. PEEK frameworks were divided into six groups (n= 10) according to veneering materials (five CAD-CAM materials and a resin composite). Group ZR: monolithic zirconia (Upcera ST-Color); Group EC: lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (IPS e.max CAD); Group LU: resin nano-ceramic (Lava Ultimate); Group VM: feldspathic ceramic (Vitablocs Mark II); Group VS: zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glassceramic (VITA Suprinity); and Group CR: indirect resin composite (Gradia). All samples were subjected to a fracture strength test in a universal test device after thermo-mechanical aging and then the results were analyzed statistically using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test. In addition, post-fracture analyses of all samples were performed with a stereomicroscope. Results: The differences in fracture strength values of different veneer materials in single crowns with a PEEK framework were statistically significant (P< 0.05). Fracture strength was highest in Group ZR (1665 N), followed by Groups LU (1440 N), EC (1249 N), CR (918 N), VS (754 N), and VM (655 N).en_US
dc.identifier.endpage171en_US
dc.identifier.issn0894-8275
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid35986930en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85137008647en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage167en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/100859
dc.identifier.volume35en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000893228400001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMosher & Linder, Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Dentistryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectShock Absorption Capacityen_US
dc.subjectCad/Cam Composite Resinen_US
dc.subjectFixed Dental Prosthesesen_US
dc.subjectIn-Vitro Fatigueen_US
dc.subjectRestorative Materialsen_US
dc.subjectSurface Modificationen_US
dc.subjectComplication Ratesen_US
dc.subjectBond Strengthen_US
dc.subjectPerformanceen_US
dc.subjectResistanceen_US
dc.titleFracture strength of different veneers on polyetheretherketone (PEEK) frameworks in implant-supported single crownsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu