Nitrogen application influenced the critical period for weed control in cotton

dc.authoridDatta, Avishek/0000-0002-5575-2766
dc.authoridKANTARCI, Zekeriya/0000-0002-4669-6045
dc.authorwosidTursun, Nihat/AID-5028-2022
dc.authorwosidTursun, Nihat/AAA-4957-2020
dc.contributor.authorTursun, Nihat
dc.contributor.authorDatta, Avishek
dc.contributor.authorTuncel, Emine
dc.contributor.authorKantarci, Zekeriya
dc.contributor.authorKnezevic, Stevan
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:40:10Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:40:10Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe critical knowledge of crop-weed competition period is important for designing weed management strategies in cropping systems. Field experiments were conducted in 2012 and 2013 growing seasons at the Agricultural Research Institute, Kahramanmaras, Turkey to determine the effect of three nitrogen (N) rates (0, 150 and 300 kg N ha(-1)) on the critical period for weed control (CPWC) in cotton. A four parameter log-logistic model was fit to the two sets of relating relative crop yield to data obtained from increasing durations of weed interference and lengths of weed-free period. In both the years and regardless of the N application rate, the relative yield of cotton decreased with increasing duration of weed-interference and increased with increasing duration of weed-free period. The application of N fertilizer delayed the beginning of the CPWC in cotton. At the 0 kg N ha(-1), the CPWC ranged from 44 to 537 GDD (growing degree days) (7-51 days after crop emergence [DAE]) in 2012 and 87-605 GDD (14 -57 DAE) in 2013 based on the 5% acceptable yield loss. At the 150 kg N ha(-1), the CPWC ranged from 124 to 597 GDD (18-56 DAE) in 2012 and 183-551 GDD (22-49 DAE) in 2013. Depending on the N application rate, weed-free conditions need to be established as early as one week after crop emergence and maintained as late as eight weeks after crop emergence to avoid more than 5% loss in cotton yield. These findings could help cotton producers improve the cost effectiveness and efficacy of their weed management programme under different N application rates. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cropro.2015.04.007
dc.identifier.endpage91en_US
dc.identifier.issn0261-2194
dc.identifier.issn1873-6904
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84927758522en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage85en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2015.04.007
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/96752
dc.identifier.volume74en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000356546600014en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Sci Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofCrop Protectionen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCritical period of weed interferenceen_US
dc.subjectCritical weed-free perioden_US
dc.subjectCrop competitionen_US
dc.subjectIntegrated weed managementen_US
dc.subjectTiming of weed removalen_US
dc.subjectWeed interferenceen_US
dc.titleNitrogen application influenced the critical period for weed control in cottonen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar