Effectiveness of maximum, explosive, and combined strength training on endurance runners performance indicators: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorPrieto-Gonzalez, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorYagin, Fatma Hilal
dc.contributor.authorSanchez-Infante, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorArdigo, Luca Paolo
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-04T13:30:46Z
dc.date.available2026-04-04T13:30:46Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study aimed to analyze the effect of practicing maximum strength (MAX), explosive strength (EXP), or both combined (COMB) on seven runners' performance indicators: vertical jump (VJ), one-repetition maximum squat (1RM), peak velocity/peak running speed (PV), lactate threshold (LT), middle-distance time trial (TT), maximum oxygen consumption (VO2(max)), and running economy (RE). Methods: A systematic review (Scopus, Web of Science, Sports Discuss, PubMed) with meta-analysis was conducted following PRISMA standards. Inclusion criteria (PICOS) were: Recreational or well-trained athletes aged 18-45 performing concurrent training for at least five weeks. The search terms used were related to different types of strength/endurance and participants' age and sports modality. Twenty manuscripts were selected, and quality assessed with PEDro. Results: MAX training is more effective than EXP and COMB in improving VJ, 1RM, and PV, while COMB is more effective than MAX and EXP to enhance TT. MAX is more effective than EXP in improving LT. Concurrent workouts do not provide additional benefits to VO2(max). It is unknown which strength modality (MAX, EXP, or COMB) is more effective in improving RE. Conclusion: Concurrent training is more effective than single-mode endurance training for enhancing specific performance variables in adult endurance runners. Middle- and long-distance runners may consider incorporating MAX training to target specific goals (i.e., improving VJ, 1RM, LT, PV) while utilizing COMB training to enhance TT. Certain variables may benefit from EXP. New randomized controlled trials are required to confirm these findings.
dc.description.sponsorshipPrince Sultan University
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors would like to thank Prince Sultan University for their support.
dc.identifier.doi10.47197/RETOS.V58.106992
dc.identifier.endpage1049
dc.identifier.issn1579-1726
dc.identifier.issn1988-2041
dc.identifier.issue58
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0668-4031
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0840-6000
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-9848-7958
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7677-5070
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85201462690
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage1030
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.47197/RETOS.V58.106992
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/108368
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001299144200001
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherFederacion Espanola Asoc Docentes Educacion Fisica-Feadef
dc.relation.ispartofRetos-Nuevas Tendencias En Educacion Fisica Deporte Y Recreacion
dc.relation.publicationcategoryDiğer
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250329
dc.subjectendurance
dc.subjectrunning
dc.subjectconcurrent training
dc.subjectmaximum strength
dc.subjectexplosive strength
dc.titleEffectiveness of maximum, explosive, and combined strength training on endurance runners performance indicators: a systematic review and meta-analysis
dc.typeReview

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu