Comparison of different retreatment techniques and root canal sealers: a scanning electron microscopic study.

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorscopusid55543550800
dc.authorscopusid8731395200
dc.authorscopusid24544570800
dc.authorscopusid55682459500
dc.authorscopusid6604070029
dc.contributor.authorSimsek N.
dc.contributor.authorKeles A.
dc.contributor.authorAhmetoglu F.
dc.contributor.authorOcak M.S.
dc.contributor.authorYologlu S.
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:02:35Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:02:35Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of two retreatment techniques, in terms of the operating time and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) results, in removing three different root canal sealers from root canals that were previously filled with gutta-percha. Sixty extracted single-rooted human premolars were divided into three groups and filled with iRoot SP, MM Seal, and AH Plus sealers, along with gutta-percha, through a lateral compaction technique. Root canal fillings of the samples were removed by ESI ultrasonic tips or R-Endo files. The time to reach the working length was recorded. Longitudinally sectioned samples were examined under SEM magnification. Each picture was evaluated in terms of the residual debris. Data were statistically analyzed with the Kruskall-Wallis test. No statistically significant differences were found in terms of operating time (p>0.05). Significant differences in the number of debris-free dentinal tubules were found among the root canal thirds, but this finding was not influenced by the experimental group (p<0.05). Resin sealer tags were observed inside the dentinal tubules in the MM Seal group. Under the conditions of this study, it may be established that there was no difference among the sealers and retreatment techniques.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/1807-3107bor-2014.vol28.0006
dc.identifier.issn1807-3107
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid24878672en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84904261167en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2014.vol28.0006
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/91807
dc.identifier.volume28en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBrazilian oral researchen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectepoxy resinen_US
dc.subjectepoxy resin based root canal sealeren_US
dc.subjectepoxy resin-based root canal sealeren_US
dc.subjectgutta perchaen_US
dc.subjectnickelen_US
dc.subjectroot canal filling materialen_US
dc.subjecttitaniumen_US
dc.subjecttitanium nickelideen_US
dc.subjectarticleen_US
dc.subjectcomparative studyen_US
dc.subjectendodonticsen_US
dc.subjectequipmenten_US
dc.subjectevaluation studyen_US
dc.subjecthumanen_US
dc.subjectmaterials testingen_US
dc.subjectmethodologyen_US
dc.subjectnonparametric testen_US
dc.subjectreproducibilityen_US
dc.subjectretreatmenten_US
dc.subjectscanning electron microscopyen_US
dc.subjecttimeen_US
dc.subjecttreatment outcomeen_US
dc.subjectEpoxy Resinsen_US
dc.subjectGutta-Perchaen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectMaterials Testingen_US
dc.subjectMicroscopy, Electron, Scanningen_US
dc.subjectNickelen_US
dc.subjectReproducibility of Resultsen_US
dc.subjectRetreatmenten_US
dc.subjectRoot Canal Filling Materialsen_US
dc.subjectRoot Canal Therapyen_US
dc.subjectStatistics, Nonparametricen_US
dc.subjectTime Factorsen_US
dc.subjectTitaniumen_US
dc.subjectTreatment Outcomeen_US
dc.subjectMLCSen_US
dc.subjectMLOWNen_US
dc.titleComparison of different retreatment techniques and root canal sealers: a scanning electron microscopic study.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu