Effects of different rest intervals in high intensity interval training programs on VO2max, body composition, and isokinetic strength and power

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridkayhan, recep fatih/0000-0002-1022-2892
dc.authorwosidkayhan, recep fatih/JXN-9527-2024
dc.contributor.authorKayhan, Recep Fatih
dc.contributor.authorBayrakdaroglu, Serdar
dc.contributor.authorCeylan, Halil Ibrahim
dc.contributor.authorEken, Ozgur
dc.contributor.authorBayrakdaroglu, Yesim
dc.contributor.authorBadicu, Georgian
dc.contributor.authorAl-Mhanna, Sameer Badri
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:56:06Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:56:06Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of 8 weeks of short and long rest running-based high-intensity training (HIIT) on body composition, isokinetic strength, and maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max). Nineteen physically active men were recruited to voluntarily participate in the study. The participants were grouped using the closed-envelope randomized method as HIIT with a short rest (HIITS, n = 9; age: 19.60 +/- 1.34 years) and HIIT with a long rest (HIITL, n = 10; age: 19.77 +/- 0.97). Pre and post the 8-week running-based HIIT program, body mass index and body fat % were measured and all subjects performed isokinetic strength tests to determine their hamstring (H)/quadriceps (Q) peak torque ratio and the peak power and peak work for their H and Q muscles. The participants also underwent a graded exercise test to determine their VO2max. Statistical analysis performed with One-Way Variance Analysis and Bonferroni correction post hoc tests. As a result of the study, there were no significant differences between the pre- and post-training isokinetic strength parameters for the H and Q of HIITL and HIITS at velocities of 60 and 240(degrees)s(-1). The VO2max did not change for HIITS training but the VO2max increased (p < 0.05) for HIITL training. In conclusion, that HIITL and HIITS programs for 8 weeks did not change the relative and absolute strength, force production and the VO2max, but the VO2max increased (p < 0.05) for HIITL training.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.22514/jomh.2024.064
dc.identifier.endpage11en_US
dc.identifier.issn1875-6867
dc.identifier.issn1875-6859
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85195947749en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.22514/jomh.2024.064
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/102055
dc.identifier.volume20en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001238515700001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMre Pressen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Mens Healthen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectPeak torqueen_US
dc.subjectPeak poweren_US
dc.subjectPeak worken_US
dc.subjectVO2maxen_US
dc.subjectH/Q ratioen_US
dc.titleEffects of different rest intervals in high intensity interval training programs on VO2max, body composition, and isokinetic strength and poweren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu