Comparison of the results of primary and secondary implantation of flexible open-loop anterior chamber intraocular lens

Simple item page
dc.authorid, osman/0000-0003-0911-8649
dc.authoridGündüz, Abuzer/0000-0003-1752-6810
dc.authoridBayramlar, Huseyin/0000-0002-8118-1151
dc.authorwosid, osman/H-3027-2019
dc.authorwosidGündüz, Abuzer/HLH-2417-2023
dc.authorwosidBayramlar, Huseyin/I-5876-2013
dc.contributor.authorBayramlar, H
dc.contributor.authorHepsen, IF
dc.contributor.authorCekic, O
dc.contributor.authorGunduz, A
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:11:58Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:11:58Z
dc.date.issued1998
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose To assess and compare the results of primary and secondary implantation of flexible open-loop anterior chamber intraocular lenses (AC-IOLs). Methods A series of 57 eyes of 56 patients with flexible AC-IOLs were reviewed in two groups. In group I (n = 35) an AC-IOL was implanted primarily, because of posterior capsule problems during extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE), and in group II (n = 22) secondarily after intracapsular cataract extraction (ICCE). Follow-up was from 12 to 38 months. Results Mean post-operative best-corrected visual acuity in group I was significantly lower (20/37.38) than that of group II (20/29.20) (p = 0.044). Best: corrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better was achieved in 19 of 29 eyes (65%) in group I, and in 16 of 21 eyes (76%) in group II. The difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). In group II 18 eyes (86%) maintained or improved visual acuity. In group I, 17 eyes (49%) had a total of 22 complications, while 7 eyes (32%) had 9 complications in group IP (p > 0.05). Conclusions Flexible open-loop AC-IOLs are suitable for both primary and secondary implantation to correct aphakia. Secondary implantation of flexible open-loop AC-IOLs after ICCE seems to have a more favourable visual outcome and a lower complication rate than primary implantation in complicated ECCE cases.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/eye.1998.212
dc.identifier.endpage828en_US
dc.identifier.issn0950-222X
dc.identifier.pmid10070518en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0031728590en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage826en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1998.212
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/93106
dc.identifier.volume12en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000076597200016en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoyal Coll Ophthalmologistsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEyeen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectanterior chamber intraocular lensen_US
dc.subjectprimary implantationen_US
dc.subjectsecondary implantationen_US
dc.titleComparison of the results of primary and secondary implantation of flexible open-loop anterior chamber intraocular lensen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Collections

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu

We collect and process your personal information for the following purposes: Authentication, Preferences, Acknowledgement and Statistics.
To learn more, please read our privacy policy.

Customize