Pilonidal Sinus Disease: An Analysis of the Factors Affecting Recurrence

dc.authorwosidTatlı, Faik/ABH-7308-2020
dc.contributor.authorKanlioz, Murat
dc.contributor.authorEkici, Ugur
dc.contributor.authorTatli, Faik
dc.contributor.authorKaratas, Turgay
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:49:15Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:49:15Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: o assess the success of treatment methods at reducing recurrence, the most important problem in pilonidal sinus disease (PSD), along with factors affecting the occurrence of PSD and posttreatment recurrence. METHODS; The researchers retrospectively analyzed files of patients treated for PSD between 2003 and 2018. Three study groups were created: G1, G2, and G3. G1 included all PSDs with recurrence, and a comparable number of cases without recurrence were selected randomly for the G2 group. The control group, G3, included healthy individuals without PSD. In all groups, the following were recorded: body mass index, skin color and oiliness, family history of PSD, hair overgrowth, smoking habit time spent sitting per day, and number of baths per week. The following were additionally recorded for G1 and G2 treatment methods, follow-up periods, pretreatment abscess(es), and time of onset of complaints before treatment The number of recurrences and the period between last treatment and recurrence were also recorded for G1. RESULTS: G1 comprised 234 patients: G2, 247 patients; and G3, 128 healthy individuals. The significant factors causing recurrence included body mass index, family history, bathing habits, hair overgrowth, skin color and oiliness, time spent sitting per day, smoking habit, abscessles), and duration of symptom(s)(P < .05). Limberg flap repair was the most successful treatment method. Sixty-three (27%), 135 (58%), and 185 (79%) recurrences occurred in the first 6 months, in the first year, and in the first 2 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The researchers recommend Limberg flap repair for treatment. It is possible to reduce recurrence by taking preventable factors into consideration.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/01.ASW.0000725168.11099.92
dc.identifier.endpage85en_US
dc.identifier.issn1527-7941
dc.identifier.issn1538-8654
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid33443913en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85099900027en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage81en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000725168.11099.92
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/99730
dc.identifier.volume34en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000616488200010en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAdvances in Skin & Wound Careen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectetiological factorsen_US
dc.subjectfollow-up timeen_US
dc.subjectpilonidal sinus diseaseen_US
dc.subjectrecurrenceen_US
dc.subjecttreatment methodsen_US
dc.subjecttreatment successen_US
dc.titlePilonidal Sinus Disease: An Analysis of the Factors Affecting Recurrenceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar