Evaluation of the pattern of fracture formation from trauma to the human mandible with finite element analysis. Part 1: Symphysis region

dc.authoridsancar, bahadir/0000-0001-8804-6668
dc.authorwosidsancar, bahadir/ABH-4490-2020
dc.contributor.authorSancar, Bahadir
dc.contributor.authorCetiner, Yunus
dc.contributor.authorDayi, Ertunc
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:53:26Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:53:26Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBackground/AimThe mandible is the largest, strongest bone in the maxillofacial region. When a fracture occurs in the mandible, its location depends on several factors: the direction of the trauma, the angle of the trauma, masticatory muscles and the quality of the bone. The aim of this study was to evaluate the stresses caused by trauma to the symphysis region from different angles. Materials and MethodsComputer-based mandible models were created, and a 2000 N force was applied to the symphysis at three different angles using finite element analysis. Six trauma situations were simulated with the mouth open or closed. Forces were applied to the symphysis at 90 degrees (Model 1) in the anteroposterior direction, 45 degrees (Model 2) in the anteroposterior-inferosuperior direction and 90 degrees (Model 3) in the inferosuperior direction, when the mouth was open or closed. The resulting stress intensity was assessed using finite element analysis. ResultsAs a result of trauma applied to the symphysis region, maximum stresses were found where the impact originated and at the condyle region (Model 2, open mouth: condyle 1 [1172 MPa]). The open mouth position caused higher stress values than the closed mouth position (Model 2, open mouth: condyle 1 [1172 MPa]; closed mouth: symphysis 4 [82 MPa]). The Model 2, open-mouth state (Model 2, open mouth: condyle 1 [1172 MPa]) sustained higher stresses than all the other models. ConclusionThe stress values in the mandible were affected by the force applied to the symphysis region, the angle of impact arrival and the open or closed state of the mouth. Keeping the mouth closed at the time of trauma reduced the stress value. A closed mouth during trauma directed at the symphysis reduced the possibility of mandible fractures.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAtaturk University Scientific Research Projecten_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAtaturk University Scientific Research Projecten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/edt.12825
dc.identifier.endpage360en_US
dc.identifier.issn1600-4469
dc.identifier.issn1600-9657
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid36807491en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85148466691en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage352en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12825
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/101179
dc.identifier.volume39en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000935049600001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofDental Traumatologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectfinite element analysisen_US
dc.subjectmandibleen_US
dc.subjecttraumaen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of the pattern of fracture formation from trauma to the human mandible with finite element analysis. Part 1: Symphysis regionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar