The Effects of Sevoflurane and Propofol on Induction, Maintenance and Recovery in Elderly Patients

dc.authorscopusid8932188900
dc.authorscopusid34569135700
dc.authorscopusid6701613323
dc.authorscopusid6603245381
dc.authorscopusid7005217039
dc.authorscopusid6506222899
dc.contributor.authorBut A.K.
dc.contributor.authorDurmuş M.
dc.contributor.authorTo?al T.
dc.contributor.authorGedik E.
dc.contributor.authorYücel A.
dc.contributor.authorÖzcan Ersoy M.
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:02:10Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:02:10Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractIn this study, we aimed to compare the effects of sevoflurane and propofol on induction, maintenance and recovery in elderly patients. Forty patients, ASA class I-II, more than 60 years of age, undergoing elective surgery that last between 2-4 hours were taken into the study. Anaesthesia was induced with 66 % N2O and 7 % sevoflurane in the group S (n=20) and 1-2 mg kg -1 propofol approximately within 30 seconds in the group P (n=20). In the two groups; loss of consciousness, loss of eyelid reflex, time to intubation, adverse effects during induction, heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) after first, third and fifth minutes of induction were recorded. Maintenance of anaesthesia was provided with 66 % N2O and 1-4 % sevoflurane in group S, 2-10 mg kg -1 h-1 propofol and 66 % N2O in group P. HR and MAP values were determined after first minutes of intubation until the end of the operation. At the end of operation after discontinuation of anaesthetic agents, times to extubation, eye opening, verbal response, orientation and Aldrete score >8 were recorded. The only difference is that induction time was shorter significantly in the group P (p<0.05). Sevoflurane and propofol recovery times and postoperative complications were similar in ASA I-II, elderly cases undergoing elective surgery. Although its hypotensive effect was prominent, induction was faster with propofol. We concluded that both of sevoflurane and propofol can be used safely for ASA I-II elderly patients, if the dose of propofol decreased and given slowly.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage230en_US
dc.identifier.issn1304-0871
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0142073922en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage224en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/91452
dc.identifier.volume31en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurk Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Dernegi Dergisien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectElderly patientsen_US
dc.subjectPropofolen_US
dc.subjectSevofluraneen_US
dc.titleThe Effects of Sevoflurane and Propofol on Induction, Maintenance and Recovery in Elderly Patientsen_US
dc.title.alternativeYaşli Olgularda Sevofluran ve Propofolün İndüksiyon, İdame ve Derlenmeye Etkisien_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar