The Effects of Sevoflurane and Propofol on Induction, Maintenance and Recovery in Elderly Patients
dc.authorscopusid | 8932188900 | |
dc.authorscopusid | 34569135700 | |
dc.authorscopusid | 6701613323 | |
dc.authorscopusid | 6603245381 | |
dc.authorscopusid | 7005217039 | |
dc.authorscopusid | 6506222899 | |
dc.contributor.author | But A.K. | |
dc.contributor.author | Durmuş M. | |
dc.contributor.author | To?al T. | |
dc.contributor.author | Gedik E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Yücel A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Özcan Ersoy M. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-04T20:02:10Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-08-04T20:02:10Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2003 | |
dc.department | İnönü Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | In this study, we aimed to compare the effects of sevoflurane and propofol on induction, maintenance and recovery in elderly patients. Forty patients, ASA class I-II, more than 60 years of age, undergoing elective surgery that last between 2-4 hours were taken into the study. Anaesthesia was induced with 66 % N2O and 7 % sevoflurane in the group S (n=20) and 1-2 mg kg -1 propofol approximately within 30 seconds in the group P (n=20). In the two groups; loss of consciousness, loss of eyelid reflex, time to intubation, adverse effects during induction, heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) after first, third and fifth minutes of induction were recorded. Maintenance of anaesthesia was provided with 66 % N2O and 1-4 % sevoflurane in group S, 2-10 mg kg -1 h-1 propofol and 66 % N2O in group P. HR and MAP values were determined after first minutes of intubation until the end of the operation. At the end of operation after discontinuation of anaesthetic agents, times to extubation, eye opening, verbal response, orientation and Aldrete score >8 were recorded. The only difference is that induction time was shorter significantly in the group P (p<0.05). Sevoflurane and propofol recovery times and postoperative complications were similar in ASA I-II, elderly cases undergoing elective surgery. Although its hypotensive effect was prominent, induction was faster with propofol. We concluded that both of sevoflurane and propofol can be used safely for ASA I-II elderly patients, if the dose of propofol decreased and given slowly. | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 230 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1304-0871 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 5 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-0142073922 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | N/A | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 224 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11616/91452 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 31 | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | en_US |
dc.language.iso | tr | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Turk Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Dernegi Dergisi | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Elderly patients | en_US |
dc.subject | Propofol | en_US |
dc.subject | Sevoflurane | en_US |
dc.title | The Effects of Sevoflurane and Propofol on Induction, Maintenance and Recovery in Elderly Patients | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | Yaşli Olgularda Sevofluran ve Propofolün İndüksiyon, İdame ve Derlenmeye Etkisi | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |