Assesment of Prelacrimal Recess in Patients With Maxillary Sinus Hypoplasia Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography

dc.authoridgümüşsoy, ismail/0000-0002-2725-3273
dc.authoridduman, suayip burak/0000-0003-2552-0187;
dc.authorwosidgümüşsoy, ismail/HSF-3376-2023
dc.authorwosidduman, suayip burak/ABE-5878-2020
dc.authorwosidPereira, Joana/HSF-3334-2023
dc.contributor.authorDuman, Suayip Burak
dc.contributor.authorGumussoy, Ismail
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:48:55Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:48:55Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBackground The prelacrimal recess approach, is frequently preferred in creating a minimally invasive surgical corridors. Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the Prelacrimal recess (PLR) anatomy using Cone Beam Computed Tomography in patients with Maxillary Sinus Hypoplasia. Methods The paranasal Cone Beam Computed Tomography series of 84 adults were analyzed retrospectively. The antero-posterior and mesio-distal widths of the PLR and the antero-posterior width of the naso-lacrimal duct were measured. The patients were divided into three groups according to the antero-posterior width of PLR to evaluate the feasibility of prelacrimal recess approach as Type 1 (0-3 mm), Type 2 (>3-7 mm) and Type 3 (>7 mm). Results The mean antero-posterior width of PLR was 3.11 +/- 1.49mm in the patients and 4.77 +/- 1.76 mm in the controls. The mean mesio-distal width of PLR was 7.64 +/- 1.49 mm in the patients and 3.17 +/- 2.05 mm in the controls. The mean antero-posterior width of naso-lacrimal duct was 9.58 +/- 2.80 mm in the patients and 9.46 +/- 2.42 mm in the controls. Conclusions The width of the antero-posterior PLR in patients with Maxillary Sinus Hypoplasia was found to be significantly lower in comparison to individuals with normal maxillary sinuses in the measurements performed on paranasal Cone Beam Computed Tomography scans. Hence, while planning a Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery with prelacrimal recess approach for maxillary sinus, the anatomical structure of the naso-sinusoidal region should be carefully analyzed, and individual anatomical variations such as Maxillary Sinus Hypoplasia should not be ignored.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1945892420959592
dc.identifier.endpage367en_US
dc.identifier.issn1945-8924
dc.identifier.issn1945-8932
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid32927966en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85091028311en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage361en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/1945892420959592
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/99543
dc.identifier.volume35en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000570658300001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSage Publications Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Rhinology & Allergyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectprelacrimal recessen_US
dc.subjectnaso-lacrimal canalen_US
dc.subjectcone beam computed tomographyen_US
dc.subjectmaxillary sinusen_US
dc.subjectfunctional endoscopic sinus surgeryen_US
dc.titleAssesment of Prelacrimal Recess in Patients With Maxillary Sinus Hypoplasia Using Cone Beam Computed Tomographyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar