Level of residual monomer released from orthodontic acrylic materials

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridAteş, Burhan/0000-0001-6080-229X
dc.authoridKeleştemur, Ünzile/0000-0003-4531-6378
dc.authorwosidMalkoc, Meral Arslan/AAC-5742-2021
dc.authorwosidAteş, Burhan/AAA-3730-2021
dc.authorwosidKeleştemur, Ünzile/A-4190-2018
dc.contributor.authorIca, R. Betul
dc.contributor.authorOzturk, Firat
dc.contributor.authorAtes, Burhan
dc.contributor.authorMalkoc, Meral Arslan
dc.contributor.authorKelestemur, Unzile
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:39:50Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:39:50Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: To quantify, with high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC), the amount of residual monomer leached from different orthodontic acrylic materials prepared with two different manipulation methods. Materials and Methods: Eighty cylindrical specimens (5 x 25 mm) were divided into eight groups (n = 10). The specimens were prepared with four acrylic materials Orthocryl Neon Blue (Dentaurum), Orthocryl EQ (Dentaurum), Orthoplast (Vertex), and 0-80 (Imicryl) and with two different manipulation methods: doughing and spray-on. HPLC measurements were made at intervals of 2 hours, 6 hours, 1 day, 1 week, and 3 months. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's honestly significant difference multiple-comparison test were used to assess the amount of monomer eluted from the various groups. To assess the differences within each group over the various periods, repeated-measures ANOVA and paired t-tests were used. Results: Statistically significant differences were found within the groups in the amount of residual monomer in the specimens at different time intervals (P < .001). HPLC showed statistically significant differences among the groups (P < .05) in the amount of eluted monomer. Evaluation of the manipulation techniques showed that the monomer release rate was higher in the specimens prepared with the doughing method. When the four acrylic materials were compared, the specimens made from Orthoplast (Vertex) showed the highest rate of monomer release with both manipulation techniques. Conclusion: The spray-on method can be recommended to clinicians for the preparation of orthodontic appliances.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2319/060713-435.1
dc.identifier.endpage867en_US
dc.identifier.issn0003-3219
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.pmid24601878en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84907015824en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage862en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.2319/060713-435.1
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/96546
dc.identifier.volume84en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000341225800015en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherE H Angle Education Research Foundation, Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAngle Orthodontisten_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectMonomer releaseen_US
dc.subjectAcrylic materialen_US
dc.subjectManipulation methodsen_US
dc.titleLevel of residual monomer released from orthodontic acrylic materialsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu