Comparison of Bolton analysis and tooth size measurements obtained using conventional and three-dimensional orthodontic models

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorscopusid24833262300
dc.authorscopusid37085714400
dc.authorscopusid23976417400
dc.contributor.authorNalcaci R.
dc.contributor.authorTopcuoglu T.
dc.contributor.authorOzturk F.
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:02:12Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:02:12Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy, reproducibility, efficacy and effectiveness of measurements obtained using digital models with those obtained using plaster models. Materials and Methods: A total of 20 digital models were produced by the Ortho Three-dimensional Models (O3DM) Laboratory and their software (O3DM version 2) was used to obtain measurements. Identical plaster models were used to obtain measurements of teeth with a vernier caliper. The maximum mesiodistal width of each study model, from first molar to first molar, was measured. All measurements were repeated at least 1 month later by the same operator for both digital and manual methods. The data were analyzed using Cronbach ?, Wilcoxon signed rank test and the McNemar test. Results: Cronbach ? value of the data at T1 and T2 for 6 anterior and 12 overall teeth measured using the two methods was very close to the ideal value of 1, indicating high intra-observer reliability. The Wilcoxon signed rank test showed statistically significant differences between the two methods (P = 0.000, P < 0.001). The measurements obtained using the digital models were lower than those obtained using the plaster models. No statistically significant differences were found between the two methods for anterior Bolton discrepancies (P = 0.375) or overall Bolton discrepancies (P = 0.00). Paired comparisons of repeated measurements for Bolton ratios showed no statistically significant differences for anterior or overall Bolton discrepancies (P = 0.688 and P = 0.375, respectively). Conclusions: Use of O3DM software is an acceptable alternative to the traditional vernier caliper method in orthodontic practice. © 2013 Dental Investigations Society.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4103/1305-7456.119077
dc.identifier.endpageS70en_US
dc.identifier.issn1305-7456
dc.identifier.issue5 SUPPL.en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84893705085en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpageS66en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.119077
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/91507
dc.identifier.volume7en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Dentistryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectBolton ratioen_US
dc.subjectDigital modelen_US
dc.subjectTooth sizeen_US
dc.subjectVernier caliperen_US
dc.titleComparison of Bolton analysis and tooth size measurements obtained using conventional and three-dimensional orthodontic modelsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu