MEDENÎ USUL HUKUKUNDA BİRDEN FAZLA HÂKİMİN KATILDIĞI YARGILAMALARDA ÇOĞUNLUĞUN SAĞLANAMAMASI DURUMUNDA KARAR
No Thumbnail Available
Files
Date
2021
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Access Rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Abstract
Toplu mahkemelerde birden fazla hâkimin katılımı ile yargılama yapılmakta ve genellikle birden fazla hâkimin katılımı ile karar verilmektedir. Bu mahkemelerde oy çokluğunun sağlanamaması ve netice olarak da kararın verilememesi yaşanması muhtemel bir hukuki durum olmasına rağmen bu durumda yapılması gerekenlere ilişkin bir hüküm pozitif düzenlemelerimizde yer almamıştır. 1086 sayılı HUMK’tan önce yürürlükte olan usul hukukuna ilişkin mevzuatta birden fazla hâkimin katıldığı yargılamalarda çoğunluğun sağlanamaması durumunda nasıl karar verilmesi gerektiğine ilişkin birtakım hükümler yer almış ve o dönem yazılan eserlerde bu konu tartışılmıştır. Ancak bu hükümler ve ilmi görüşler 1086 sayılı HUMK’a ve neticede modern usul hukukuna etki etmemiştir.
In the courts, the proceedings are held with the participation of more than one judge, and decisions are usually made with the participation of more than one judge. Even though it is possible that the majority of votes cannot be constituted in such courts and consequently the decision cannot be made, there is not a provision regarding what shall be done in this circumstance in lex lata. In the legislation which was in force before the Code of Civil Procedure numbered 1086 was enacted, there are a number of provisions regulating how a decision shall be made in cases where the majority was not constituted in the proceedings which more than one judge participated, and this issue was discussed by legal scholars at that time. However, such provisions and legal opinions asserted did not affect the Code of Civil Procedure numbered 1086 and the modern legislation as to civil procedure.
In the courts, the proceedings are held with the participation of more than one judge, and decisions are usually made with the participation of more than one judge. Even though it is possible that the majority of votes cannot be constituted in such courts and consequently the decision cannot be made, there is not a provision regarding what shall be done in this circumstance in lex lata. In the legislation which was in force before the Code of Civil Procedure numbered 1086 was enacted, there are a number of provisions regulating how a decision shall be made in cases where the majority was not constituted in the proceedings which more than one judge participated, and this issue was discussed by legal scholars at that time. However, such provisions and legal opinions asserted did not affect the Code of Civil Procedure numbered 1086 and the modern legislation as to civil procedure.
Description
Keywords
Journal or Series
Medenî Usûl ve İcra - İflâs Hukuku Dergisi
WoS Q Value
Scopus Q Value
Volume
17
Issue
49
Citation
ÖZKAN Y (2021). MEDENÎ USUL HUKUKUNDA BİRDEN FAZLA HÂKİMİN KATILDIĞI YARGILAMALARDA ÇOĞUNLUĞUN SAĞLANAMAMASI DURUMUNDA KARAR. Medenî Usûl ve İcra - İflâs Hukuku Dergisi, 17(49), 599 - 610.
