Comparison of efficiency and safety of two rigid ureterorenoscopes with different sizes

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorscopusid6603043776
dc.authorscopusid57210681380
dc.authorscopusid57225711977
dc.authorscopusid7005388789
dc.authorscopusid6506725802
dc.contributor.authorU?raş M.
dc.contributor.authorGüneş A.
dc.contributor.authorKiliç S.
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz U.
dc.contributor.authorBaydinç Y.C.
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:01:03Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:01:03Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Ureterorenoscopes with different features are being produced by various companies for the treatment of ureteric stone disease. Independent and objective evaluations of efficiency and safety are needed for these equipments while purchasing. Material and Methods: Retrospective evaluation of 142 and 115 operations for ureteric stones using 11.5F and 10F rigid ureterorenoscopes respectively was done, noting stone free rates, application of intracorporeal lithotripsy, need for auxilary procedures or open surgery and complications. Efficiency coefficient (EC) was calculated for each equipment, and inter-group statistical analysis was performed. Results: The ureterorenoscope with a smaller diameter had a higher EC, lower need for auxilary procedures and open surgery. Complications showed different dispersion for each equipment and only some of them revealed statistical significance. Conclusion: We think that ureterorenoscopes with smaller diameter are more efficient and safe, but may have some unexpected complications. Although not mentioned in this article, it should be considered that knowledge, experience and habits of the surgeon are as much effective as these objective criteria on the results.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage79en_US
dc.identifier.issn1300-5804
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-1442277690en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage72en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/91228
dc.identifier.volume29en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurk Uroloji Dergisien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectComplicationen_US
dc.subjectEfficiencyen_US
dc.subjectSafetyen_US
dc.subjectUreteral stoneen_US
dc.subjectUreterorenoscopyen_US
dc.titleComparison of efficiency and safety of two rigid ureterorenoscopes with different sizesen_US
dc.title.alternativeFarkli Çaplasrdaki iki rijid Üreterorenoskopun Etk?inlik ve Güvenili?inin Karşilaştirilmasien_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu