Regional anesthesia is a good alternative to general anesthesia in pediatric surgery: Experience in 1,554 children

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridDemircan, Mehmet/0000-0002-4022-1276
dc.authoridMutus, Huseyin Murat/0000-0002-0059-1336
dc.authoridUĞURALP, SEMA/0000-0002-7628-0550;
dc.authorwosidDemircan, Mehmet/B-1904-2008
dc.authorwosidMutus, Huseyin Murat/AAA-2357-2020
dc.authorwosidDemircan, Mehmet/AAW-7162-2020
dc.authorwosidUĞURALP, SEMA/ABH-6309-2020
dc.authorwosidGürbüz, Necla/H-8965-2018
dc.contributor.authorUguralp, S
dc.contributor.authorMutus, M
dc.contributor.authorKoroglu, A
dc.contributor.authorGurbuz, N
dc.contributor.authorKoltuksuz, U
dc.contributor.authorDemircan, M
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:12:22Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:12:22Z
dc.date.issued2002
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBackground/Purpose: Although caudal and spinal blocks are modern and safe techniques, in many centers children still are operated on under general anesthesia (GA), or the blocks are used for postoperative analgesia after GA in infraumbilical operations. The authors aimed to document the results and the complications of 1,554 regional anesthesia cases, thereby assessing their validity. Methods: The analysis of 1,459 caudal and 95 spinal blocks cases collected until January 2001 in children from newborn to 12 years of age are documented retrospectively. The types of anesthesia analyzed in the study were caudal block (CB) only, CB plus GA, GA plus CB, GA plus spinal block, and spinal block only. Results: There were 1,338 caudal and 95 spinal block cases that clinically were satisfactory. Because the duration of CB produce a CB occurred in 82 cases (5.57%). There were 257 of 1,338 patients operated on under GA and supported by caudal block for postoperative analgesia. Conclusions: Caudal anesthesia seems to be an inexpensive, simple, and effective technique not only as a supplement for postoperative analgesia, but also as a single method of anesthesia. and the authors recommend its use in a wider setting of clinical entities in infraumbilical surgical procedures of children. Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1053/jpsu.2002.31619
dc.identifier.endpage613en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-3468
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid11912520en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0036219748en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage610en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1053/jpsu.2002.31619
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/93392
dc.identifier.volume37en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000174909700010en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherW B Saunders Coen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Pediatric Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectregional anesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectcaudal anesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectspinal anesthesiaen_US
dc.titleRegional anesthesia is a good alternative to general anesthesia in pediatric surgery: Experience in 1,554 childrenen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu