Quality of different gutta-percha techniques when filling experimental internal resorptive cavities: A micro-computed tomography study

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridKeleş, Ali/0000-0003-2835-767X;
dc.authorwosidKeleş, Ali/J-5897-2015
dc.authorwosiduzun, ismail/AAB-5472-2022
dc.contributor.authorKeles, Ali
dc.contributor.authorAhmetoglu, Fuat
dc.contributor.authorUzun, Ismail
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:39:58Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:39:58Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this ex vivo study was to determine the quality of root fillings in experimental internal resorptive cavities filled using cold lateral condensation (CLC), vertical condensation and Thermafil techniques. Forty-five extracted maxillary canine teeth were selected. After root canal instrumentation, the roots were sectioned horizontally and experimental internal resorption cavities were prepared. The root sections were re-approximated with a luting agent and randomly assigned to three groups (n = 15) to be filled using CLC, vertical condensation and Thermafil, respectively. Assessment of obturation quality in the internal resorptive cavity was performed using a desktop X-ray micro focus computed tomography scanner, and the percentage of gutta-percha (GP), sealer and voiding was calculated for each specimen. Data were statistically analysed using non-parametric tests, with P < 0.05 denoting a statistically significant difference. Vertical condensation filled 96.25 +/- 8.31% of the total artificial cavity, and was superior to CLC (63.20 +/- 16.87%) and Thermafil (59.26 +/- 18.47%). The mean percentage of voids was 3.75 +/- 8.31% in the vertical condensation group, 37.09 +/- 17.13% in the CLC group and 41.06 +/- 18.60% in the Thermafil group. We conclude that obturation of experimental resorption cavities is significantly better when using vertical condensation than when using other GP-based techniques.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipInonu University Committee of Research Projectsen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe author denies any conflicts of interest. This study was supported by the Inonu University Committee of Research Projects. The authors thank Prof. Saim Yologlu for statistical assistance.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/aej.12043
dc.identifier.endpage135en_US
dc.identifier.issn1329-1947
dc.identifier.issn1747-4477
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid24118357en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84914112974en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage131en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12043
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/96617
dc.identifier.volume40en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000347177400006en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwellen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAustralian Endodontic Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectgutta-perchaen_US
dc.subjectinternal resorptionen_US
dc.subjectmicro-computed tomographyen_US
dc.subjectsealeren_US
dc.subjectvoidsen_US
dc.titleQuality of different gutta-percha techniques when filling experimental internal resorptive cavities: A micro-computed tomography studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu