A comparison of computerized tomography and flair-SWI MRI results of patients with head injury attending the emergency department

dc.authoriddurak, mehmet akif akif/0000-0003-0827-2708
dc.authoridtetik, bora/0000-0001-7696-7785;
dc.authorwosiddurak, mehmet akif akif/ABI-1169-2020
dc.authorwosidtetik, bora/AAA-8841-2021
dc.authorwosidYıldırım, İsmail Okan/AFR-8243-2022
dc.contributor.authorDurak, M. A.
dc.contributor.authorGurbuez, S.
dc.contributor.authorDerya, S.
dc.contributor.authorYildirim, I. o.
dc.contributor.authorEkmekyapar, M.
dc.contributor.authorTetik, B.
dc.contributor.authorColak, C.
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:53:18Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:53:18Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstract- OBJECTIVE: Detection of trau-matic brain injury (TBI) is of vital importance in patients who apply to the emergency depart-ment with a history of trauma. The aim of initial imaging in patients with suspected TBI is to de-tect trauma-related injury quickly and accurate-ly. In this study, the effectiveness of prospec-tively cranial computed tomography (CT) and fluid attenuation inversion recovery (FLAIR) and susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) sequence magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination results of patients diagnosed with TBI in the emergency department in terms of bleeding de-tection was investigated in the light of the liter-ature. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with traumatic brain injury who applied to the emer-gency department between 2016 and 2020 were included in this prospective study. Crani-al CT and MRI images containing SWI-FLAIR se-quence were taken on the same day, immediate-ly after cranial CT, for a total of 500 patients. RESULTS: In our study, TBI was detected in 242 males (70.8%) and 100 females (29.2%), for a total of 342 patients. The mean age was 41.45, the mean GCS was 13.35. There was a history of trauma such as falling in 155 patients (45.3%), traffic accidents in 171 patients (50%), and trau-ma in 16 patients (4.7%). In the comparative eval-uation of CT and FLAIR-SWI MRI examinations no bleeding was detected in the FLAIR-SWI sec-tions of 239 patients who did not have bleed-ing on CT; however, bleeding was detected in FLAIR-SWI sections in 14 patients who did not have bleeding on CT. CONCLUSIONS: FLAIR-SWI MR, which is a more reliable examination method, should be per-formed before control CT, especially in patients with incompatible clinical and admission CT.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage9161en_US
dc.identifier.issn1128-3602
dc.identifier.issue24en_US
dc.identifier.pmid36591827en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85145344352en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage9157en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/101091
dc.identifier.volume26en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000914641100011en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherVerduci Publisheren_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Review For Medical and Pharmacological Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectSAHen_US
dc.subjectSWIen_US
dc.subjectEmergencyen_US
dc.subjectFlairen_US
dc.titleA comparison of computerized tomography and flair-SWI MRI results of patients with head injury attending the emergency departmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar