Evaluation of Muslim women's perspectives on natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) surgery

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorGundogan, Ersin
dc.contributor.authorKayaalp, Cuneyt
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:55:55Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:55:55Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Patient perception of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery, which is a minimally invasive surgical technique, is not clear. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the perspectives of Asian women on this method. Methods: There were two groups in the study; medical personnel with 100 female participants and the general population. After a brief briefing on the method, a questionnaire with 25 questions was applied by the teams who were impartial and had knowledge about the method. Results: The mean age of the participants was 31.6 +/- 10.9 years, the mean height was 163 +/- 5.7 cm, and the mean weight was 63.5 +/- 12.3 kg. When the survey results were examined, it was found that 131 (68.9%) of the participants had a problem with the surgery scar and 191 (96.9%) wanted to have surgery without this scar. When asked why, aesthetic anxiety (85.5%), pain (73.9%) and hernia risk (73.4%) answers were given respectively. Although only 56 (28%) of the participants had heard of the natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) method, it was found that 92 (46%) of them were worried that this method would affect their sexual life, and 49 (24.5%) were not sure about this. It was also found that the participants preferred the transvaginal (52.1%) method the most, followed by the transoral (34.2%), and transanal (13.7%) method, respectively. The order of preference of cholecystectomy methods was laparoscopic (53.7%), NOSE (41.2%), and conventional (5.1%). Conclusions: Although the rate of awareness of natural orifice surgery is lower in Asian country than in other countries, it seems that this rate will increase with adequate information. Education level, sociocultural structure and insufficient public opinion seem to be the main reasons that decrease this rate.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.21037/ales-23-52
dc.identifier.issn2518-6973
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85190722328en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.21037/ales-23-52
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/101938
dc.identifier.volume9en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001226972100008en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAme Publishing Companyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectMinimally invasive surgeryen_US
dc.subjectnatural orifice surgeryen_US
dc.subjectlaparoscopyen_US
dc.subjecttransanalen_US
dc.subjecttransvaginalen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of Muslim women's perspectives on natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) surgeryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu