Two cases of laparoscopic total colectomy with natural orifice specimen extraction and review of the literature

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridSumer, Fatih/0000-0002-0557-1369
dc.authoridAktas, Aydin/0000-0003-3407-0210;
dc.authorwosidSumer, Fatih/F-8042-2017
dc.authorwosidKayaalp, Cuneyt/AAH-1764-2021
dc.authorwosidAktas, Aydin/AAC-3425-2021
dc.authorwosidGundogan, Ersin/AFE-0184-2022
dc.contributor.authorGundogan, Ersin
dc.contributor.authorAktas, Aydin
dc.contributor.authorKayaalp, Cuneyt
dc.contributor.authorGonultas, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorSumer, Fatih
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:44:05Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:44:05Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractWe present two cases of natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) after laparoscopic total colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis (TC-IRA), and we also review all of the previously reported cases. Our aim was to focus on patient selection for NOSE after TC-IRA. The PubMed and Google Scholar databases were scanned. Demographic features, surgical indications, and techniques were analyzed. Basic calculations were used for statistical analysis. A total of 13 cases were detected in addition to our 2 cases. All of the specimens were removed through the natural orifices successfully. No case required a diverting ileostomy. No patients were converted to open surgery or to conventional laparoscopy. Complications were reported in three patients. Transanal extractions were performed in 12 cases (10 colonic inertia, 2 polyposis), and transvaginal extractions were performed in 3 cases (2 malignancy, 1 colonic inertia). Both transanal and transvaginal specimen extractions after laparoscopic TC-IRA can be preferred. However, transanal extraction seems to be feasible in cases of TC for benign disease with a limited mesenteric-omental resection. If the indication is a malignancy requiring a mesenteric-omental resection, a transvaginal route should be preferred for a voluminous specimen.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5114/wiitm.2017.69227
dc.identifier.endpage296en_US
dc.identifier.issn1895-4588
dc.identifier.issn2299-0054
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid29062451en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85031670806en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage291en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2017.69227
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/97996
dc.identifier.volume12en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000412199700013en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTermedia Publishing House Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofVideosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniquesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectnatural orifice surgeryen_US
dc.subjectslow transit constipationen_US
dc.subjectcolorectal canceren_US
dc.subjectlaparoscopic colorectal surgeryen_US
dc.subjectreviewen_US
dc.subjecttransrectalen_US
dc.titleTwo cases of laparoscopic total colectomy with natural orifice specimen extraction and review of the literatureen_US
dc.typeReview Articleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu