Cement Thickness of Inlay Restorations Made of Lithium Disilicate, Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic and Nano-Ceramic CAD/CAM Materials Evaluated Using 3D X-Ray Micro-Computed Tomography

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridÖzcan, Mutlu/0000-0002-9623-6098
dc.authoridColak, Hakan/0000-0001-8262-0913;
dc.authorwosidÖzcan, Mutlu/B-2862-2013
dc.authorwosidColak, Hakan/F-5868-2015
dc.authorwosidUzgur, Recep/GWU-9228-2022
dc.contributor.authorUzgur, Recep
dc.contributor.authorErcan, Ertugrul
dc.contributor.authorUzgur, Zeynep
dc.contributor.authorColak, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorYalcin, Muhammet
dc.contributor.authorOzcan, Mutlu
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:42:34Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:42:34Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractPurposeTo evaluate the marginal and internal cement thicknesses of inlay restorations made of various CAD/CAM materials using 3D X-ray micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) technique. Materials and MethodsCaries-free extracted mandibular molars (N = 30) with similar size were randomly assigned to three groups (N = 10 per group). Mesio-occlusal-distal (MOD) cavities were prepared, and inlay restorations were obtained by milling out CAD/CAM materials namely, (a) IPS: monolithic lithium disilicate (control), (b) VE: polymer-infiltrated ceramic, and (c) CS: nano-ceramic using a CAM unit. Marginal and internal cement thicknesses were measured using 3D micro-CT. Data were analyzed using 1-way ANOVA and Tukey's tests (alpha = 0.05). ResultsThe mean marginal and internal cement thickness were not significant in all inlay materials (p > 0.05). Mean marginal cement thickness (m) was the lowest for the IPS group (67.54 10.16) followed by VE (84.09 3.94) and CS (95.18 +/- 10.58) (p > 0.05). The internal cement thickness (m) was the lowest in the CS group (54.85 +/- 6.94) followed by IPS (60.58 +/- 9.22) and VE (77.53 +/- 12.13) (p > 0.05). ConclusionMarginal and internal cement thicknesses of MOD inlays made of monolithic lithium disilicate, polymer-infiltrated ceramic, and nano-ceramic CAD/CAM materials were similar and all less than 100 m, which could be considered clinically acceptable. Clinical significanceMOD inlays made of different CAD/CAM materials presented similar cement thickness, less than 100 m.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipKirikkale University, Research Center, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by Kirikkale University, Research Center, Turkey.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jopr.12521
dc.identifier.endpage460en_US
dc.identifier.issn1059-941X
dc.identifier.issn1532-849X
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.pmid27517616en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84981331787en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage456en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12521
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/97456
dc.identifier.volume27en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000435265200010en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCAD/CAMen_US
dc.subjectcement thicknessen_US
dc.subjectmicro-CTen_US
dc.titleCement Thickness of Inlay Restorations Made of Lithium Disilicate, Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic and Nano-Ceramic CAD/CAM Materials Evaluated Using 3D X-Ray Micro-Computed Tomographyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu