Comparison of pharyngeal airway volume among different vertical skeletal patterns: A cone-beam computed tomography study

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorwosidcelikoglu, mevlut/C-1280-2016
dc.contributor.authorCelikoglu, Mevlut
dc.contributor.authorBayram, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorSekerci, Ahmet E.
dc.contributor.authorBuyuk, Suleyman K.
dc.contributor.authorToy, Ebubekir
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:39:43Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:39:43Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: To test the null hypothesis that there are no significant differences in pharyngeal airway volumes among adult patients with different vertical skeletal patterns and a clinically normal sagittal skeletal pattern using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Material and Methods: The study sample consisted of 100 adult patients (45 men and 55 women; mean age = 24.0 +/- 5.3 years) with a normal sagittal skeletal pattern divided into three groups according to the vertical skeletal patterns: high angle (32 patients: 15 women and 17 men), low angle (34 patients: 14 women and 20 men), and normal angle (34 patients: 16 women and 18 men) groups. Nasopharyngeal, oropharyngeal, and total airway volumes of patients in all vertical groups were calculated. Group differences were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey tests. Results: Nasopharyngeal airway volume in the high-angle group (mean = 6067.9 +/- 1693.9 mm(3)) was significantly lower than that of the low- and normal-angle groups (P < .01). Oropharyngeal airway volume was highest in the low-angle group (mean = 15,957.6 +/- 6817.2 mm(3)) and significantly decreased in the control (mean = 11,826.1 +/- 4831.9 mm(3); P = .008) and high angle (mean = 10,869.1 +/- 4084.1 mm(3); P = .001) groups. Total airway volume was highest in the low-angle group (mean = 24,261.6 +/- 8470.1 mm(3)) and lowest in the high-angle group (mean = 16,937.0 +/- 5027.4 mm(3); P < .001). Conclusion: The null hypothesis was rejected. Significant differences were found in pharyngeal airway volumes among different skeletal vertical patterns.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2319/101013-748.1
dc.identifier.endpage787en_US
dc.identifier.issn0003-3219
dc.identifier.issn1945-7103
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.pmid24592903en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84901811495en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage782en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.2319/101013-748.1
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/96470
dc.identifier.volume84en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000341225800004en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherE H Angle Education Research Foundation, Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAngle Orthodontisten_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectPharyngeal airwayen_US
dc.subjectVertical skeletal patternen_US
dc.subjectCone-beam computed tomographyen_US
dc.titleComparison of pharyngeal airway volume among different vertical skeletal patterns: A cone-beam computed tomography studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu