Comparison of the Effects of Low-Level Laser Therapy and Ozone Therapy on Bone Healing

dc.authoridhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-7312-2867en_US
dc.contributor.authorAlan, Hilal
dc.contributor.authorVardi, Nigar
dc.contributor.authorOzgur, Cem
dc.contributor.authorHuseyin, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorYolcu, Umit
dc.contributor.authorDogan, Derya Ozdemir
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-06T07:01:35Z
dc.date.available2020-03-06T07:01:35Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.descriptionLIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS, TWO COMMERCE SQ, 2001 MARKET ST, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103 USAen_US
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to compare the effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and ozone therapy on the bone healing. Thirty-six adult male Wistar albino rats were used for this study. Monocortical defects were shaped in right femur of all rats. Defects were filled with nano-hydroxyapatite graft. The animals were divided into 3 groups and each group was than divided into 2 subgroups. Then, LLLT with a diode laser was applied to the first group (G1), ozone therapy was applied to the second group (G2), and no treatment was applied to the third group as a control group (G3). Animals were sacrificed after 4th and 8th weeks and the sections were examined to evaluate the density of the inflammation, the formation of connective tissue, the osteogenic potential, and osteocalcin activity. As a result, there were no significant differences among the groups of 4 weeks in terms of new bone formation. In the immunohistochemical assessment, the number of osteocalcin-positive cells was higher in the laser group compared to the other group of 4 weeks; this difference was statistically significant in the LLLT and ozone groups (P < 0.05). Histomorphometric assessment showed that the new bone areas were higher in the LLLT and ozone groups; furthermore, there was a statistically significant difference in the LLLT in comparison with the control group at 8th week (P < 0.05). At the same time immunohistochemical assessment showed that osteocalcin-positive cells were considerably higher in G2 than G1 at 8th week (P < 0.05). The findings of this study may be the result of differences in the number of treatment sessions. Further studies are therefore needed to determine the optimal treatment modality.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAlan, H., Vardi, N., Ozgur, C. Huseyin, A., Yolcu, U., Dogan, D.O. (2015). Comparison of the Effects of Low-Level Laser Therapy and Ozone Therapy on Bone Healing. İnönü Üniversitesi, Malatya.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/SCS.0000000000001871en_US
dc.identifier.endpageE400en_US
dc.identifier.issn1049-2275
dc.identifier.issn1536-3732
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.startpageE396en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/15313
dc.identifier.volume26en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERYen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERYen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectBone healingen_US
dc.subjectLow-level laser therapyen_US
dc.subjectOzoneen_US
dc.subjectRaten_US
dc.titleComparison of the Effects of Low-Level Laser Therapy and Ozone Therapy on Bone Healingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Makale Dosyası.pdf
Boyut:
1.4 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Makale Dosyası
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.71 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: