The efficacy of laser, ultrasound and self-adjustable file in removing smear layer debris from oval root canals following retreatment: A scanning electron microscopy study

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridKeskin, Cangul/0000-0001-8990-4847
dc.authoridKeleş, Ali/0000-0003-2835-767X;
dc.authorwosidKeskin, Cangul/ACA-8702-2022
dc.authorwosidKeleş, Ali/J-5897-2015
dc.authorwosiduzun, ismail/AAB-5472-2022
dc.contributor.authorKeles, Ali
dc.contributor.authorKamalak, Aliye
dc.contributor.authorKeskin, Cangul
dc.contributor.authorAkcay, Merve
dc.contributor.authorUzun, Ismail
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:42:51Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:42:51Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to compare the efficacy of different irrigation activation methods to remove smear layer and debris from oval-shaped root canals following retreatment. Ninety mandibular canines with oval-shaped root canals were selected. Retreatment was performed with R-Endo retreatment files. The samples were randomly divided into six groups (n=15). Groups were assigned according to agitation technique: R-Endo with classic irrigation, with self-adjustable file, with passive ultrasonic irrigation, R-Endo+Er:YAG, R-Endo+PIPS and R-Endo+Nd:YAG. Compared with the classic irrigation (R-Endo+CI) group, all other groups were more successful in reducing smear layer and debris (P<0.05). The least amount of residual smear layer and debris was detected in the Er:YAG laser group (P<0.05). Additional use of different agitation methods contributes to removal of debris and smear layer following root canal filling removal with rotary instruments; however, none of the techniques tested render root canal walls completely free of smear layer or debris.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey-TUBTAK [114S052]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey-TUBTAK (grant no. 114S052). The authors deny any conflicts of interest.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/aej.12145
dc.identifier.endpage111en_US
dc.identifier.issn1329-1947
dc.identifier.issn1747-4477
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid26786709en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85001950537en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage104en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12145
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/97616
dc.identifier.volume42en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000389407700003en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAustralian Endodontic Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectEr:YAG laseren_US
dc.subjectNd:YAG laseren_US
dc.subjectPIPS laseren_US
dc.subjectretreatmenten_US
dc.subjectSAFen_US
dc.subjectultrasonicen_US
dc.titleThe efficacy of laser, ultrasound and self-adjustable file in removing smear layer debris from oval root canals following retreatment: A scanning electron microscopy studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu