Morphometric Analysis of Cleft Lip Palate and Prognathic Mandibles in Relation to Mandibular Canal Course

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridsancar, bahadir/0000-0001-8804-6668
dc.authoriddedeoğlu, numan/0000-0003-0892-3654
dc.authorwosidsancar, bahadir/ABH-4490-2020
dc.authorwosiddedeoğlu, numan/ABH-2864-2020
dc.contributor.authorSancar, Bahadir
dc.contributor.authorDedeoglu, Numan
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:49:24Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:49:24Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: This study aimed to evaluate the mandibular canal course in individuals with cleft lip palate (CLP) and mandibular prognathism in terms of the sagittal split-ramus osteotomy using cone-beam computed tomography. Materials and Methods: Individuals with CLP older than 16 years of age and planned to undergo Le fort I + SSR osteotomies and those with class III occlusion planned to undergo Le fort I + SSR osteotomies were included. The measurements on the cleft side of CLP patients were compared with both their noncleft sides and those with class III occlusion. The course of the inferior alveolar nerve and its position in the mandible were evaluated starting from the mandibular foramen, the first entrance to the mandible, to the mental foramen, the exit from the mandible. Results: The distance between the mandibular canal and the buccal surface of the mandible (B3) on the plane tangent to the distal of the mandibular first molar and perpendicular to the occlusal plane was found to be greater in individuals with CLP (P = 0.011). Buccal cortex thickness (C4) at the level of the mandibular canal on the plane tangent to the distal of the mandibular second molar and perpendicular to the occlusal plane was found to be lower in individuals with CLP (P = 0.021). Conclusions: The buccal cortex thickness of the mandible corpus and the distance of the mandibular canal to the buccal surface is different in patients with CLP compared to class III individuals' posterior to the mandible. Surgeons should take these differences into consideration during mandibular osteotomy.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/SCS.0000000000007502
dc.identifier.endpage697en_US
dc.identifier.issn1049-2275
dc.identifier.issn1536-3732
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid33705012en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85102822217en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage694en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000007502
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/99837
dc.identifier.volume32en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000662269900099en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Craniofacial Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCleft lip palateen_US
dc.subjectcone beam computed tomographyen_US
dc.subjectcraniofacial morphologyen_US
dc.subjectorthognathic surgeryen_US
dc.subjectsagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO)en_US
dc.titleMorphometric Analysis of Cleft Lip Palate and Prognathic Mandibles in Relation to Mandibular Canal Courseen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu