Farklı Germe Egzersizi Protokollerinin Bazı Anaerobik Motorik Testler Üzerine Akut Etkileri
Yükleniyor...
Tarih
2019
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Öz: Amaç: Bu çalışmada farklı germe egzersizi protokollerinin bazı anaerobik motoriktestler üzerine akut etkisinin incelenmesi amaçlandı.Gereç ve Yöntemler: Araştırmaya en az üç yıldır düzenli spor yapan 15 erkekdenek, (yaş: 21.8±1.4 yıl, boy 1.77±0.32 m, vücut ağırlığı: 69.1±6.7 kg, vücut kütleindeksi (VKİ) 21.9±2.0 kg/m2 ve vücut yağ oranları (VYO) 10.9±4.0 %) gönüllü olarakkatıldı. Gönüllülere birbirini izlemeyen günlerde beş farklı germe egzersizi protokolü uygulandı. Germe egzersizi protokolleriolarak 5 dk hafif tempo koşu (GUE), 5 dk hafif tempo koşu ve statik germe egzersizi (SG), 5 dk hafif tempo koşu vedinamik germe egzersizi (DG), 5 dk hafif tempo koşu ve statik germe egzersizi + dinamik germe egzersizi (SDG), 5 dkhafif tempo koşu ve dinamik germe egzersizi + statik germe egzersizi (DSG) uygulandı. Farklı germe egzersiziprotokolleri arasındaki anlamlılık sınaması için tekrarlayan ölçümlü (repeated) ANOVA kullanıldı.Bulgular: Farklı germe egzersizi protokollerinin dikey sıçrama, zirve güç, ortalama güç, çeviklik performansısonuçları üzerinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir etkisi olmadığı saptandı (p>0.05). Germe egzersizi protokollerinegöre, katılımcıların 10m, 20m ve 30m doğrusal koşu testi sonuçları istatistiksel olarak farklı (sırasıyla p<0.001, p<0.001ve p<0.01) anlamlı bulundu.Sonuç: Araştırma sonucunda elde edilen bulgulara göre; farklı germe egzersizi protokollerinin ilgili motor performansparametreleri açısından farklı etkilere sahip olduğu görüldü. Antrenör ve sporculara 10m, 20m ve 30m doğrusal koşuperformansından daha çok verim alabilmeleri amacıyla öncesinde dinamik germe egzersizi uygulamaları önerilebilir.
Öz: Objective: In this study, it was aimed to investigate the acute effects of different stretching exercise protocols on some anaerobic motoric tests. Material and Methods: The sample group of this study consists of 15 male (age: 21.8±1.4 years, stature: 1.77±0.32 m, body mass: 69.1±6.7 kg, body mass index (BMI) 21.9±2.0 kg/m2 , body fat ratio (BFR) 10.9±4.0 %) volunteers who were engaged in regular exercise for at least three years. Volunteers performed five different stretching exercise protocols on non-consecutive days. Stretching exercise protocols were determined as follows: light jogging for only 5 mins (NS), light jogging and static stretching exercise (SS), light jogging and dynamic stretching exercise (DS), light jogging and static stretching exercise + dynamic stretching exercise (SDS), light jogging and dynamic stretching exercise + static stretching exercise (DSS). "Repeated measures ANOVA" test was used to determine the effect of different stretching exercise protocols on vertical jumping, agility, anaerobic power, mean power and linear running scores. Results: Different stretching protocols did not make a statistically significant effect on vertical jumping, anaerobic power, mean power and agility test results (p>0.05). Participants' linear running test results for 10, 20 and 30 m revealed significant differences with respect to stretching protocols (respectively p<0.001, p<0.001 ve p<0.01). Conclusion: The results of this study revealed that linear running performance figures were observed to be highest after dynamic stretching exercise. Dynamic stretching exercise protocols are recommended to trainers and athletes in order to reach better performance in 10m, 20m and 30m sprints.
Öz: Objective: In this study, it was aimed to investigate the acute effects of different stretching exercise protocols on some anaerobic motoric tests. Material and Methods: The sample group of this study consists of 15 male (age: 21.8±1.4 years, stature: 1.77±0.32 m, body mass: 69.1±6.7 kg, body mass index (BMI) 21.9±2.0 kg/m2 , body fat ratio (BFR) 10.9±4.0 %) volunteers who were engaged in regular exercise for at least three years. Volunteers performed five different stretching exercise protocols on non-consecutive days. Stretching exercise protocols were determined as follows: light jogging for only 5 mins (NS), light jogging and static stretching exercise (SS), light jogging and dynamic stretching exercise (DS), light jogging and static stretching exercise + dynamic stretching exercise (SDS), light jogging and dynamic stretching exercise + static stretching exercise (DSS). "Repeated measures ANOVA" test was used to determine the effect of different stretching exercise protocols on vertical jumping, agility, anaerobic power, mean power and linear running scores. Results: Different stretching protocols did not make a statistically significant effect on vertical jumping, anaerobic power, mean power and agility test results (p>0.05). Participants' linear running test results for 10, 20 and 30 m revealed significant differences with respect to stretching protocols (respectively p<0.001, p<0.001 ve p<0.01). Conclusion: The results of this study revealed that linear running performance figures were observed to be highest after dynamic stretching exercise. Dynamic stretching exercise protocols are recommended to trainers and athletes in order to reach better performance in 10m, 20m and 30m sprints.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynak
Spor Hekimliği Dergisi
WoS Q Değeri
Scopus Q Değeri
Cilt
54
Sayı
2
Künye
AYDIN Y,KAFKAS A,ÇINARLI F. S,EKEN Ö,KURT C,KAFKAS M. E (2019). Farklı Germe Egzersizi Protokollerinin Bazı Anaerobik Motorik Testler
Üzerine Akut Etkileri. Spor Hekimliği Dergisi, 54(2), 99 - 107. Doi: 10.5152/tjsm.2019.12
