vHIT results with the synapsis system according to clinicians' dominant hand use

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridİnceoğlu, Feyza/0000-0003-1453-0937
dc.authoridCENGİZ, Deniz Uğur/0000-0002-7855-0251
dc.authoridKARABABA, Ercan/0000-0002-5207-0014
dc.authoridDundar, Mehmet Akif/0000-0001-9004-8400
dc.authorwosidKirazli, Gulce/ADT-5773-2022
dc.authorwosidİnceoğlu, Feyza/GVK-2847-2022
dc.authorwosidCENGİZ, Deniz Uğur/ABI-4493-2020
dc.authorwosidKARABABA, Ercan/HKN-4335-2023
dc.contributor.authorEmekci, Tugba
dc.contributor.authorDundar, Mehmet Akif
dc.contributor.authorKirazli, Gulce
dc.contributor.authorInceoglu, Feyza
dc.contributor.authorCengiz, Deniz Ugur
dc.contributor.authorKilinc, Fatma Men
dc.contributor.authorKarababa, Ercan
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:53:32Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:53:32Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: There exists limited information in the literature on dominant hand preference in relation with vHIT applications. The present study aimed to examine the relationship between the clinician's dominant use of rightor left-hand and vHIT results. METHODS: A Synapsys vHIT Ulmer device was used in the study. The tests were administered by 3 clinicians experienced in vHIT, 2 of whom were right-handed and 1 left-handed. The test was applied to the 94 participants three times, one week apart. RESULTS: In this study, the correlation between right-handed clinicians and left-handed clinicians was examined, and in all SCCs, namely RA, LA, RL, LL, RP and LP, a moderate positive significant correlation was found between right-handed1 and right-handed2, between right-handed1 and left-handed, and between right-handed2 and left-handed. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, these findings suggested that measures were reliable across test sessions regardless of hand dominancy (right or left). Based on the vHIT results we obtained with three different right- or left-handed clinicians, the clinician should evaluate the results according to the dominant side. Keywords: Hand-dominance, left-hand dominance, right-hand dominance,en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3233/VES-220073
dc.identifier.endpage113en_US
dc.identifier.issn0957-4271
dc.identifier.issn1878-6464
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid36776084en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85150665673en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage105en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3233/VES-220073
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/101239
dc.identifier.volume33en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000951576300002en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIos Pressen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Vestibular Research-Equilibrium & Orientationen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectHand-dominanceen_US
dc.subjectleft-hand dominanceen_US
dc.subjectright-hand dominanceen_US
dc.subjectvestibulo-ocular reflexen_US
dc.subjectvideo head impulse testen_US
dc.titlevHIT results with the synapsis system according to clinicians' dominant hand useen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu