Evaluating the Logistics Performance of One Belt One Road Project Countries with Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorYuruyen, Ali Aygun
dc.contributor.authorAltay, Huseyin
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-04T13:31:20Z
dc.date.available2026-04-04T13:31:20Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractLogistics is significant for national governments to evaluate the activities, functions and elements of the existing country-level logistics system to develop competitive advantage. The Logistics Performance Index (LPI) is one of the most reliable reports used to evaluate logistics performance at the country level. In this study, a new hybrid model using the SIWEC, CRITIC, LOPCOW and MACONT methods from the Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods is proposed to measure the logistics performance of the countries located in the northern, southern and central corridors of the One Belt, One Road Project (OBORP) connecting Asia to Europe. SIWEC, CRITIC, and LOPCOW methods were used to calculate the objective weights of the criteria for each corridor. The MACONT method was employed to rank the countries based on their logistics performance for each corridor. According to the combined criteria weights, the most important criterion in the northern corridor was international shipping, while the least crucial criterion was customs. The most crucial criterion in the southern corridor was customs, while the least crucial criterion was tracking and tracing. In the middle corridor, the most crucial criterion was tracking and tracing, while the least crucial criterion was logistics quality and competence. Owing to the analysis made with the MACONT method, Germany was the country that showed the best logistics performance in all three corridors. The results obtained for each corridor using the decision-making approach offered in the study were compared with other alternative assessment methods such as MARA, ARAS, COPRAS, GIA, EDAS and OCRA to ensure the validity and robustness of the findings. Based on the comparison, it was observed that the results obtained for each corridor were quite similar, and the proposed approach gave consistent results.
dc.identifier.doi10.30798/makuiibf.1609904
dc.identifier.endpage774
dc.identifier.issn2149-1658
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-9528-5552
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0323-7789
dc.identifier.startpage750
dc.identifier.trdizinid1326446
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.1609904
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/1326446
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/108736
dc.identifier.volume12
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001523328200019
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMehmet Akif Ersoy Univ
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250329
dc.subjectLogistics Performance Index (LPI)
dc.subjectMulti Criteria Decision Making (MCDM)
dc.subjectSIWEC
dc.subjectCRITIC
dc.subjectLOPCOW
dc.subjectMACONT
dc.titleEvaluating the Logistics Performance of One Belt One Road Project Countries with Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu