The feasibility of falciformopexy in the repair of peptic ulcer perforation

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridOcaklı, Serhat/0000-0002-3176-4914
dc.authoridterzioglu, gokay/0000-0003-2975-0430
dc.authoridCeylan, Cengiz/0000-0003-3471-8726
dc.authoridCANLIKARAKAYA, FIRAT/0000-0003-4858-7480
dc.authorwosidOcaklı, Serhat/IST-8062-2023
dc.authorwosidterzioglu, gokay/IST-1718-2023
dc.authorwosidCeylan, Cengiz/AAC-7461-2022
dc.authorwosidkılıç, murat Özgür/HJP-8863-2023
dc.authorwosidCANLIKARAKAYA, FIRAT/JUV-6395-2023
dc.contributor.authorTerzioglu, Serdar Gokay
dc.contributor.authorCanlikarakaya, Firat
dc.contributor.authorOcakli, Serhat
dc.contributor.authorCeylan, Cengiz
dc.contributor.authorAgackiran, Ibrahim
dc.contributor.authorAkinci, Felat
dc.contributor.authorKilic, Murat Ozguer
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:54:47Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:54:47Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Modified Graham omentopexy is the most commonly used operative technique in the repair of peptic ulcer perforation (PUP); however, there is little data on falciformopexy in the literature. The aim is to investigate the feasibility of falciformopexy in the repair of PUP, comparing with modified Graham omentopexy.METHODS: Data of 471 patients who were operated for PUP were retrospectively analyzed. Patients' demographics, pre-operative basic laboratory findings, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status, operative findings, and post-operative complications were recorded. The patients were classified into two groups modified Graham omentopexy and falciformopexy, and then compared with each other in terms of clinical characteristics, operative findings, and post-operative complications.RESULTS: Modified Graham omentopexy and falciformopexy were performed in 425 (90.2%) and 46 (9.8%) patients, respectively. The two groups were similar in terms of basic patient characteristics and pre-operative laboratory findings (P>0.05). ASA physical status was significantly different between the groups (P=0.001). No statistically significant difference was found between the groups in terms of complications, except for an anastomotic leak. Anastomotic leak was observed more frequently in patients who underwent falciformopexy than in patients with modified Graham omentopexy (P=0.017). CONCLUSION: Although falciformopexy technique has a higher rate of leak compared to the modified Graham omentopexy method, it should be kept in mind as an alternative method for repair of PUP, especially in cases where omentopexy cannot be applied for various reasons such as the presence of unavailable or unsuitable omentum.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.14744/tjtes.2023.53246
dc.identifier.endpage1241en_US
dc.identifier.issn1306-696X
dc.identifier.issn1307-7945
dc.identifier.issue11en_US
dc.identifier.pmid37889028en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85175280164en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1237en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2023.53246
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/101639
dc.identifier.volume29en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001096720400004en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTurkish Assoc Trauma Emergency Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.ispartofUlusal Travma Ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectFalciformopexyen_US
dc.subjectmodified graham omentopexyen_US
dc.subjectpeptic ulcer perforation.en_US
dc.titleThe feasibility of falciformopexy in the repair of peptic ulcer perforationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu