Comparison between laparoscopic and conventionaltechnique in the surgical treatment of choledocholithiasis
| dc.contributor.author | AYDIN, Mehmet Can | |
| dc.contributor.author | KARAHAN, Servet Rüştü | |
| dc.contributor.author | KÖSE, Emin | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-09T14:10:36Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-11-09T14:10:36Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.department | İnönü Üniversitesi | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Öz: Introduction: The aim of the study is to compare f conventional and laparoscopic techniques in common bile duct exploration in terms of efficacy and safety.Materials and Methods: The data of 280 patients who underwent surgical procedure for common bile duct stones between January 2011 and December 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. This was an Ethics Committee-approved retrospective analysis of data between 2011 and 2016. The patients were divided into two groups according to the common bile duct exploration technique: laparoscopic (Group 1, 164 patients) and conventional (Group 2, 116 patients). The two groups were compared in terms of surgical findings and short-term results.Results: 170 (60.7%) of the patients were women. The mean age was 61.9±16.9 years. Clinical results showed that the operative time (120±35.9 vs 169±48.4 minutes, p<0.01) and hospital stay (6.3±3.9 vs 10.9±6.8 days, p<0.01) were shorter in Group 1; overall morbidity (9% vs 24%, p<0.01) and mortality rates (1.2% vs 6%, p<0.03) were lower. Postoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy requirement was less (7% vs 18.1%, p <0.01). In addition, in Group 1, there was a higher rate of stone clearance (93.9% vs 82.8%, p<0.01) with a lower rate of wound infection (0.6% vs 10.3%, p<0.01). No difference was observed in terms of re-operation, bile leakage or drain dislocation.Conclusion: In terms of stone clearance, hospital stay, morbidity, mortality and complication rates, laparoscopic common bile duct exploration is a significantly safer and more effective method compared to conventional exploration. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | AYDIN M, KARAHAN S, KÖSE E (2020). Comparison between laparoscopic and conventionaltechnique in the surgical treatment of choledocholithiasis. Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science, 27(3), 122 - 129. 10.14744/less.2020.37929 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.14744/less.2020.37929 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 129 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2587-0610 | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 3 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 122 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.trdizinid | 418773 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.14744/less.2020.37929 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11616/85245 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/418773 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 27 | en_US |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | TR-Dizin | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science | en_US |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
| dc.title | Comparison between laparoscopic and conventionaltechnique in the surgical treatment of choledocholithiasis | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
