Minimally invasive approaches and their efficacy in pediatric urolithiasis

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridBeytur, Ali/0000-0002-7870-3318;
dc.authorwosidaltintas, ramazan/AAP-2348-2020
dc.authorwosidBeytur, Ali/AAA-2823-2021
dc.authorwosidCimen, Serhan/X-4007-2018
dc.contributor.authorAltintas, Ramazan
dc.contributor.authorBeytur, Ali
dc.contributor.authorOguz, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorCimen, Serhan
dc.contributor.authorAkdemir, Ender
dc.contributor.authorGunes, Ali
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:37:36Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:37:36Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: We compared the frequency of usage and success of minimally invasive approaches in the management of pediatric urolithiasis in our clinic. Material and methods: Data from pediatric patients (<= 16 years of age) who had undergone percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL), ureterorenoscopy (URS), and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) between January 2001 and December 2011 were retrospectively investigated. Results: In this study, 415 pediatric patients, who were treated for 291 renal, and 124 ureteral stones, were evaluated. The patients were treated with PNL (n=148; 82 boys, 66 girls), URS (n=99; 58 boys, and 41 girls) or ESWL (n=168; 91 boys, and 77 girls). The mean patient ages were 7.3 (1-16), 9.1 (1-16), and 8.8 (1-16) years in the PNL, URS, and ESWL groups, respectively. The stone-free rates after treatment with PNL, URS, and ESWL were 77, 83.8 and 88.7%, respectively. Conclusion: It is important that selected therapies are properly planned, and the use of minimally invasive approaches is important in pediatric patients due to potentially high recurrence rates. Currently, ESWL, PNL and URS are performed with high success rates for the treatment of stones, and open surgery is rarely used due to the success obtained with minimally invasive approaches.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5152/tud.2013.018
dc.identifier.endpage115en_US
dc.identifier.issn2149-3235
dc.identifier.issn2149-3057
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid26328091en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84878076643en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage111en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2013.018
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/96068
dc.identifier.volume39en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000420573500009en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAvesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Journal of Urologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectESWLen_US
dc.subjectminimally invasive approachen_US
dc.subjectpediatric urolithiasisen_US
dc.titleMinimally invasive approaches and their efficacy in pediatric urolithiasisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu