Comparison of oxygen transfer efficiency using new types of baffle blocks

dc.authoridDursun, Omer Faruk/0000-0003-3923-5205
dc.authorwosidDursun, Omer Faruk/AAA-8464-2020
dc.contributor.authorAydogdu, Mahmut
dc.contributor.authorDursun, O. Faruk
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:50:52Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:50:52Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractOxygen is needed in water to maintain the natural ecological balance and the health of organisms. The amount of dissolved oxygen (DO) in water can be increased naturally in different ways. In particular, some hydraulic structures are designed so reoxygenation of water occurs spontaneously over a short distance and in a short time. Baffled chutes are designed to dissipate the energy of flow in irrigation systems, wastewater systems and stormwater systems. Staggered baffle blocks placed in a chute channel not only dissipate the energy of the water but also allow free oxygen transition between the water-air surface by means of hydraulic jumps. While water flows over, between and around the blocks, air bubbles are entrained into the water. The entrained air bubbles in the flow start to dissolve within the chute and the DO concentration in the water thus increases. In this study, the amount of DO was determined for baffle blocks with six different geometric shapes, different flow discharges and angle variations (10 & DEG; & LE; & alpha; & LE; 56 & DEG;). The oxygen transfer efficiency of the new baffle blocks designed in this study was found to be very effective. Different block types were found to have greater oxygen transfer efficiency for chutes with different slopes.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipResearch Fund of the Inonu University Scientific Research Projects Unit [FDK-2018-1394, FBG-2018-1474, FCD-2018-1324]en_US
dc.description.sponsorship~This paper has been produced from M. Aydogdu's PhD thesis (Aydogdu, 2021). The research was supported by the Research Fund of the Inonu University Scientific Research Projects Unit (project IDs FDK-2018-1394, FBG-2018-1474 and FCD-2018-1324).en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1680/jwama.21.00039
dc.identifier.endpage211en_US
dc.identifier.issn1741-7589
dc.identifier.issn1751-7729
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85119334017en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage200en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1680/jwama.21.00039
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/100315
dc.identifier.volume176en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001051514500001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEmerald Group Publishing Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofProceedings of The Institution of Civil Engineers-Water Managementen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectenvironmenten_US
dc.subjecthydraulics & hydrodynamicsen_US
dc.subjectwaterways & canalsen_US
dc.titleComparison of oxygen transfer efficiency using new types of baffle blocksen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar