Regional differences of Turkey in risk factors of newborn hearing loss

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridKirkim, Gunay/0000-0003-4170-5317
dc.authoridBAYAR MULUK, NURAY/0000-0003-3602-9289
dc.authoridcekic, sule/0000-0001-8174-800X
dc.authorwosidKirkim, Gunay/JCE-0173-2023
dc.authorwosidBAYAR MULUK, NURAY/JJE-2906-2023
dc.authorwosidcekic, sule/I-2420-2014
dc.contributor.authorKonukseven, Ozlem
dc.contributor.authorKaya, Sule
dc.contributor.authorGenc, Aydan
dc.contributor.authorMuluk, Nuray Bayar
dc.contributor.authorBasar, Figen Suren
dc.contributor.authorKirkim, Gunay
dc.contributor.authorTuncer, Ulku
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:43:58Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:43:58Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study was to discover Turkish regional differences in the risk factors of newborn hearing loss. Method: A multi-centered retrospective design was used. A total of 443 children, registered to the national newborn hearing screening programme, with bilateral hearing loss, from five different regions of Turkey, were evaluated in terms of the types of hearing loss, the degree of hearing loss, the types of risk factors, parental consanguinity, age at diagnosis and age of auditory intervention, respectively. Results: There was no significant difference in the prevalence of hearing loss between regions (chi(2) = 3.210, P = 0.523). Symmetric Sensorineural Hearing Loss (SSHL) was the most common type of HL in all regions (91.8%). Profound HL was the most common degree of HL in all regions (46.2%). There were statistically significant differences between regions in terms of types of HL (chi(2) = 14.151, P = 0.000). As a total, 323 (72.9%) of subjects did not have any risk factors. There were statistically significant differences between regions in terms of the types of risk factors (pre, pen and post-natal) for SSNHL (chi(2) = 16.095, P = 0.000). For all regions, the age of diagnosis was convenient with the JCIH criteria. However the age of hearing aid application was prolonged in some regions. There were statistically significant differences between regions in terms of the age of diagnosis (chi(2) = 93.570, P = 0.000) and the age of auditory intervention (chi(2) = 47.323, P = 0.000). The confounding effects of gender, age of diagnosis, age of hearing aids applications, HL in the family, types of risk factors for HL on SSNHL were detected. Conclusion: To reach the goal of a high quality newborn hearing screening, there is a need to develop an evidence-based standard for follow up guideline. In addition, risk factors should be re-evaluated according to regional differences and all regions should take their own precautions according to their evidence based data. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.08.028
dc.identifier.endpage55en_US
dc.identifier.issn0165-5876
dc.identifier.issn1872-8464
dc.identifier.pmid29106875en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85028808622en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage49en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.08.028
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/97956
dc.identifier.volume102en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000415777600010en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ireland Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectSymmetric sensorineural hearing lossen_US
dc.subjectRisk factorsen_US
dc.subjectParental consanguinityen_US
dc.titleRegional differences of Turkey in risk factors of newborn hearing lossen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu