Comparison of the results of ultrasonographic evaluation and arthroscopy in patients scheduled for surgery of the supraspinatus tendon rupture

dc.authoridAtaoğlu, Baybars/0000-0003-1359-7013
dc.authoridKanatli, Ulunay/0000-0002-9807-9305
dc.authorwosidAtaoğlu, Baybars/AAX-9031-2021
dc.contributor.authorGormeli, Cemille
dc.contributor.authorGormeli, Gokay
dc.contributor.authorYucesoy, Cuneyt
dc.contributor.authorAtaoglu, Baybars
dc.contributor.authorKanatli, Ulunay
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:40:21Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:40:21Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND and OBJECTIVES: This study aims to compare the findings of the shoulder ultrasonography (US) of patients with a supraspinatus (SS) tendon rupture with those of the shoulder arthroscopy, to determine the reliability and diagnostic performance of the shoulder US in the algorithm of the SS tendon pathologic lesions and their secondary ultrasonographic findings. DESIGN and SETTINGS: A prospective study conducted with patients scheduled for arthroscopy of the shoulder due to an SS tendon rupture in Yildirim Beyazit Education and Research Center and Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey. MATERIALS and METHODS: Fifty patients scheduled for an arthroscopy of the shoulder due to an SS tendon rupture were evaluated by shoulder US 1 week before the surgery. SS tendon pathologic lesions (tendinosis, partial tears, and full-thickness tears) and humeral degeneration were recorded, and the results of shoulder US were compared with those of arthroscopy. RESULTS: With reference to the arthroscopic data, the sensitivity of the ultrasonographic evaluation for the diagnosis of a full-thickness SS tendon rupture was 91%, with a specificity of 88%; the sensitivity for the diagnosis of a partial-thickness rupture was 86%, with a specificity of 82%; and the sensitivity for the diagnosis of a tendinosis was 98%, with a specificity of 71%. With reference to the arthroscopic data, the sensitivity of US for the diagnosis of humeral degeneration was 93%, with a specificity of 91%. CONCLUSION: The high sensitivity and specificity rates of US in detecting SS tendon rupture and its secondary imaging findings make it an efficient and reliable diagnostic modality, which should be preferred to other more expensive and more invasive methods in the algorithm.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5144/0256-4947.2014.522
dc.identifier.endpage526en_US
dc.identifier.issn0256-4947
dc.identifier.issn1319-9226
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.pmid25971827en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84937203788en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage522en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2014.522
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/96868
dc.identifier.volume34en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000356419600011en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherK Faisal Spec Hosp Res Centreen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of Saudi Medicineen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectRotator Cuff Tearsen_US
dc.subjectUltrasounden_US
dc.subjectArthrographyen_US
dc.subjectAssociationen_US
dc.subjectSonographyen_US
dc.subjectDisordersen_US
dc.titleComparison of the results of ultrasonographic evaluation and arthroscopy in patients scheduled for surgery of the supraspinatus tendon ruptureen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar