Comparison of medium-term revision rates after autograft and allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridAslantürk, Okan/0000-0001-6167-3952
dc.authorwosidAslantürk, Okan/AAV-8484-2020
dc.contributor.authorSevimli, Resit
dc.contributor.authorGormeli, Gokay
dc.contributor.authorPolat, Haci
dc.contributor.authorKilinc, Oner
dc.contributor.authorTurkmen, Ersen
dc.contributor.authorAslanturk, Okan
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:49:04Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:49:04Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractAim: The present study investigates time until revision and revision rates, and their relationship with gender and age, among 267 patients with anterior cruciate ligament tears treated with autograft and allograft reconstructions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective evaluation was carried out based on data collected on 269 knees (bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft in 25, gracilis-semitendinosus autograft in 136, quadriceps autograft in two, allograft in 106) belonging to 267 patients who underwent an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction between 2009 and 2018. RESULTS: Of the 269 knees of the 267 patients (22 women and 247 men) operated on for an anterior cruciate ligament rupture, an autograft was used in 163, and nine of those required revision, while an allograft was used in 106 knees, and seven required revision. Revision surgery was necessary for six out of the 22 female patients and for only 10 out of the 247 male patients (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Each type of graft used for treatment is associated with certain advantages and disadvantages. Hamstring autografts and allografts were the most commonly used grafts during the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgeries carried out at our clinics. The rate of re-rupture was quite low with use of both graft types, leading us to believe that the type of graft preferred for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery should be based on a common decision of the surgeon and patient.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage416en_US
dc.identifier.issn0003-469X
dc.identifier.issn2239-253X
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid32417832en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85095861089en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage410en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/99622
dc.identifier.volume91en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000596854200011en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEdizioni Luigi Pozzien_US
dc.relation.ispartofAnnali Italiani Di Chirurgiaen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAllograften_US
dc.subjectAnterior cruciate ligamenten_US
dc.subjectAutograften_US
dc.subjectLooseningen_US
dc.subjectRevisionen_US
dc.titleComparison of medium-term revision rates after autograft and allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstructionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu