What are the Factors that Impact the Outcomes of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair?

dc.contributor.authorKilinc, O.
dc.contributor.authorErtem, K.
dc.contributor.authorErgen, E.
dc.contributor.authorAslanturk, O.
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:55:57Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:55:57Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBackground:The cuff is a complex structure with many factors affecting it. How much it is affected after repair is still being investigated. Aim:The aim of this study was to analyze the functional results of individuals who received arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and assess the various factors that could impact these outcomes. Methods:The study included 57 patients with a mean age of 58.8 years (range: 39-71) who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair between 2013 and 2020, with a minimum of 6 months after the operation. Functional and clinical outcomes of the patients were evaluated using preoperative and postoperative scores (QDASH, ASES, and VAS). The study also analyzed how demographic factors, type and duration of the tear, comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension (HT), and other pathologies may have affected the patients' scores. Results:The effect of the operation on the scores in rotator cuff tears was highly significant (P < 0.05). Age, gender, tear size, fatty degeneration, anchor configuration, comorbidities, and additional procedures presented variable values on postoperative scores, but were not statistically significant. The effect of DM and HT on VAS scores was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion:The results of rotator cuff repair appear to be influenced by several factors, including the sex of the patient, type and duration of tear, comorbidities, and surgical procedures used. Although these factors had an effect on the scores, they were not statistically significant.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4103/njcp.njcp_706_23
dc.identifier.endpage488en_US
dc.identifier.issn1119-3077
dc.identifier.issn2229-7731
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid38679771en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85191750830en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage483en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_706_23
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/101957
dc.identifier.volume27en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001214700200001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer Medknow Publicationsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofNigerian Journal of Clinical Practiceen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectArthroscopic cuff repairen_US
dc.subjectfactors of cuff resultsen_US
dc.subjectrotator cuff tearsen_US
dc.titleWhat are the Factors that Impact the Outcomes of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar