Comparison of the results between monocanalicular and bicanalicular silicone tube intubation in children with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction

dc.contributor.authorDemirel, Soner
dc.contributor.authorDemir, Utku
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-08T12:59:36Z
dc.date.available2022-02-08T12:59:36Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractAbstract: Aim: In this study we aimed to compare the retrospective results of the success rates in children with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction undergoing monocanalicular and bicanalicular silicone tube intubation. Materials and Methods: Bicanalicular (Group 1) and monocanalicular (Group 2) silicone tube intubation was performed in 48 eyes of 42 patients using the Ritleng method. Sixteen of the patients were boys and 26 were girls. Bicanalicular silicone tube intubation was performed in 26 eyes of 22 patients, and monocanalicular silicone tube intubation was performed in 22 eyes of 20 patients. Results: The mean age of patients was 5.68±1.83 years (2-9 years) in the first group, and 5.05±1.76 years (3-9 years) in the second group. The period of leaving the silicone tube was 3.61±1.38 months (1-6 months) in the first group, and 3.18±1.00 months (1-6 months) in the second group. The mean follow up period of the patients was found to be 11.8 months (6-36 months) in the bicanalicular group and 14.0 months (6-36 months) in the monocanalicular group.The success rate was 92.30% (22 of 26 eyes) in the first group and 95.45% (21 of 22 eyes) in the second group. In the first group, 2 patient’s bicanalicular tube was removed spontaneously 2 months ago, 2 patients were performed dacryocystorhinostomy, 1 patient developed pyogenic granuloma and laceration occurred in the lower canaliculus of 1 patient. In the second group, the tubes of 2 patients were removed spontaneously 2 months ago and silicone tube intubation was performed again with the same method. In this group, 1 patient was then performed dacryocystorhinostomy and 1 patient developed conjunctivitis. There were no corneal or conjunctival complications in either group. Conclusion: There was no statistically significant difference in success rates between the groups (p>0.05).en_US
dc.identifier.citationDEMİREL S,DEMİR U (2021). Comparison of the results between monocanalicular and bicanalicular silicone tube intubation in children with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Annals of Medical Research, 28(11), 2044 - 2048.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.12.1196en_US
dc.identifier.endpage2048en_US
dc.identifier.issn2636-7688
dc.identifier.issue11en_US
dc.identifier.startpage2044en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid482778en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.12.1196
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/46880
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/482778
dc.identifier.volume28en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of Medical Researchen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.titleComparison of the results between monocanalicular and bicanalicular silicone tube intubation in children with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstructionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
c762bd38-d2d0-46cd-865e-d861e142f7bc.pdf
Boyut:
145.46 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.71 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: