Which renewable energy consumption is more efficient by fuzzy EDAS method based on PESTLE dimensions?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridÖcal, Oğuz/0000-0002-5729-7218
dc.authoridDerindag, Omer Faruk/0000-0002-6693-0628
dc.authoridASLAN, Alper/0000-0003-1408-0921
dc.authorwosidÖcal, Oğuz/U-2541-2019
dc.authorwosidDerindag, Omer Faruk/ABI-2557-2020
dc.contributor.authorDemirtas, Ozgur
dc.contributor.authorDerindag, Omer Faruk
dc.contributor.authorZarali, Fulya
dc.contributor.authorOcal, Oguz
dc.contributor.authorAslan, Alper
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:49:23Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:49:23Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe facilities that energy delivers to social life and economic activities render it indispensable. Hence, it is equally critical that the energy cycle must have a sustainable structure. Therefore, it is an indisputable fact that developing and performing correct and consistent energy policies is vitally necessary. Energy consumption planning includes a continuous process to reassess existing and potential alternative energy approaches and strategies. The public and private decision-makers in charge of planning and managing energy consumption policies must adapt their strategies to novel and superior alternative resources according to sustainability and efficiency criteria. In this paper, the fuzzy EDAS method is used to address the best renewable energy consumption by taking political, economic, social, technological, legal, and environmental (PESTLE) dimensions into account. The analysis of the paper indicates the most efficient renewable energy consumption is sourced by geothermal, solar, wind, hydroelectricity, and biomass, respectively. By further investigation, it is concluded that the most optimum renewable energy consumption alternatives based on PESTLE dimensions are geothermal and solar energies.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11356-021-13310-0
dc.identifier.endpage36287en_US
dc.identifier.issn0944-1344
dc.identifier.issn1614-7499
dc.identifier.issue27en_US
dc.identifier.pmid33687631en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85102347479en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage36274en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13310-0
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/99810
dc.identifier.volume28en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000626836600002en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Heidelbergen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironmental Science and Pollution Researchen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectRenewable energy consumptionen_US
dc.subjectEnergy planningen_US
dc.subjectAnalytical hierarchy processen_US
dc.subjectPESTLEen_US
dc.subjectFuzzy-EDASen_US
dc.titleWhich renewable energy consumption is more efficient by fuzzy EDAS method based on PESTLE dimensions?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu