Clinical Performance of Nanofilled and Microhybrid Direct Composite Restorations on Endodontically Treated Teeth

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridKARA TUNCER, AYSUN/0000-0001-6443-2601
dc.authoridGozukara Bag, Harika Gozde/0000-0003-1208-4072
dc.authoridToz Akalin, Tugba/0000-0001-6427-3903
dc.authoridÖzcan, Mutlu/0000-0002-9623-6098
dc.authorwosidKARA TUNCER, AYSUN/JYO-9730-2024
dc.authorwosidGozukara Bag, Harika Gozde/ABG-7588-2020
dc.authorwosidÖztürk Bozkurt, Funda/AAL-2486-2020
dc.authorwosidToz Akalin, Tugba/KHG-6274-2024
dc.authorwosidÖzcan, Mutlu/B-2862-2013
dc.contributor.authorAkalin, Tugba Toz
dc.contributor.authorBozkurt, Funda Ozturk
dc.contributor.authorTuncer, Aysun Kara
dc.contributor.authorBag, Harika Gozukara
dc.contributor.authorOzcan, Mutlu
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:45:44Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:45:44Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThis study evaluated the clinical performance of direct restorations made of nanofilled and microhybrid resin composites in endodontically treated teeth. Twenty patients (11 males, 9 females; mean age: 34.2 +/- 10) that met the inclusion criteria received a total of 48 restorations. After employing etch-and-rinse adhesive system, one dentist placed all restorations using either a nanofilled (Filtek Ultimate) or microhybrid (Filtek Z250) resin composite. The restorations were clinically reviewed at baseline, 6 months, and up to 2 years using the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. The changes were analyzed using the McNemar test and marginal homogeneity tests (p< 0.05). The mean observation period was 17.4 months. With respect to color match, marginal adaptation, secondary caries, and surface texture, no significant differences were found between the two restorative materials (p> 0.05). Most restorations yielded alpha or bravo scores with respect to the evaluation criteria. Five restorations failed due to chipping up to 2 years (1 microhybrid at 6 m, and 3 at 2 years; 1 nanofilled at 2 y) and were repaired. One complete replacement and one extraction due to endodontic complications were needed for 2 microhybrid resin group at 2 years.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1922/EJPRD_01638Akalin09
dc.identifier.endpage47en_US
dc.identifier.issn0965-7452
dc.identifier.issn2396-8893
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid30779495en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85062063449en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage39en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_01638Akalin09
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/98666
dc.identifier.volume27en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000459372800006en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherDennis Barber Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAdhesionen_US
dc.subjectAgingen_US
dc.subjectClinical Trialen_US
dc.subjectEstheticsen_US
dc.subjectEndodonticsen_US
dc.subjectResin compositeen_US
dc.subjectUSPHSen_US
dc.subjectAged Restorationsen_US
dc.subjectEndodontically Treated Toothen_US
dc.titleClinical Performance of Nanofilled and Microhybrid Direct Composite Restorations on Endodontically Treated Teethen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu