The mechanical or electrical induction of medullary angiogenesis will it improve sternal wound healing
Yükleniyor...
Dosyalar
Tarih
2004
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Tex Heart Inst J
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
We induced angiogenesis in the tibial medulla and cortex of rabbits by electrical and
mechanical stimulation, with the aim of future application to ischemic disease.
Sixteen New Zealand rabbits were divided into 4 groups: in Group 1, a K wire was inserted
into the medullary channel; in Group 2, a hole was drilled into the tibia; in Group
3, electrical stimulation was applied to the medullary channel; and in Group 4 (the control
group), nothing was done. The interventions were applied during a 21-day period,
after which all animals were evaluated scintigraphically and histopathologically.
All 3 interventional groups were significantly superior to the control group in regard
to medullary and cortical vascularity: the P values were 0.021 in all comparisons to control.
However, the most fibrotic changes in the medulla occurred in the group that had
been treated with electricity (P=0.008). Slight fibrotic changes occurred in the hole
group (P=0.040), and none occurred in the K-wire group.
In sum, all 3 interventions are capable of inducing medullary angiogenesis, but electricity
is inferior in regard to fibrotic change. We believe that this present study can establish
a baseline for further work that explores clinical applications to problematic
ischemic conditions, including delayed sternal wound healing after cardiac surgery.
(Tex Heart Inst J 2004;31:363-7)
Açıklama
Texas Heart Institute Journal
Anahtar Kelimeler
Angiogenesis, Bone regeneration, Electric stimulation therapy, Neovascularization, Physiologic
Kaynak
Tex Heart Inst J
WoS Q Değeri
Scopus Q Değeri
Cilt
31
Sayı
0
Künye
Alat, İ., İnan, M., Gürses, İ., Kekilli, E., Germen, B., Harma, A., … Aydın, Ö. M. (2004). The Mechanical Or Electrical İnduction Of Medullary Angiogenesis Will İt İmprove Sternal Wound Healing . Tex Heart Inst J, (31), 363–367.
