Clinical Evaluation of Silorane and Nano-hybrid Resin Composite Restorations in Class II Cavities up to 3 Years

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridGozukara Bag, Harika Gozde/0000-0003-1208-4072
dc.authoridÖzcan, Mutlu/0000-0002-9623-6098
dc.authoridtuncer, safa/0000-0003-2101-3225
dc.authoridKARA TUNCER, AYSUN/0000-0001-6443-2601
dc.authorwosidGozukara Bag, Harika Gozde/ABG-7588-2020
dc.authorwosidÖztürk Bozkurt, Funda/AAL-2486-2020
dc.authorwosidÖzcan, Mutlu/B-2862-2013
dc.authorwosidtuncer, safa/AAC-5077-2020
dc.authorwosidKARA TUNCER, AYSUN/JYO-9730-2024
dc.contributor.authorOzturk-Bozkurt, F.
dc.contributor.authorToz, T.
dc.contributor.authorKara-Tuncer, A.
dc.contributor.authorGozukara-Bag, H.
dc.contributor.authorOzcan, M.
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:42:45Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:42:45Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractIn this study, the clinical performance of a silorane-based resin composite (SC) vs a nano-hybrid resin composite (NHC) was evaluated in Class II cavities. From January 2012 to February 2013, a total of 29 patients (eight men, 21 women; mean age, 24 +/- 5 years) received 29 pairs of restorations using both SC (Filtek Silorane, 3M ESPE) and NHC (Filtek Z550, 3M ESPE) materials. Patients were followed until February 2015. One operator performed all restorations using the corresponding adhesive resins according to the manufacturers' instructions. Two calibrated independent examiners evaluated the restorations at one week, six months, and then annually using the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria for anatomic form, marginal adaptation, color match, surface roughness, marginal discoloration, secondary caries, and postoperative sensitivity. Changes in the USPHS parameters were analyzed with the McNemar test (alpha=0.05). The mean observation period was 31.2 months. Marginal adaptation was the only parameter that showed a significant difference and was worse for SC than NHC (p=0.012). At the final recall, 17 restorations from the SC group and five from the NHC group received a score of 1 (explorer catches). These scores were significantly different between baseline and final recall for SC (p<0.001) but not for NHC (p>0.05). Both NHC and SC performed similarly in Class II restorations up to three years except for marginal adaptation, for which the latter demonstrated significant deterioration at the final recall compared with baseline.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2341/15-259-C
dc.identifier.endpage606en_US
dc.identifier.issn0361-7734
dc.identifier.issn1559-2863
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.pmid27589274en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84994803428en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage599en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.2341/15-259-C
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/97573
dc.identifier.volume41en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000387340400004en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOperative Dentistry Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofOperative Dentistryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectShrinkageen_US
dc.subjectStabilityen_US
dc.subjectBehavioren_US
dc.titleClinical Evaluation of Silorane and Nano-hybrid Resin Composite Restorations in Class II Cavities up to 3 Yearsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu