Load-bearing capacity and failure types of premolars restored with sonic activated bulk-fill-, nano-hybrid and silorane-based resin restorative materials

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridGozukara Bag, Harika Gozde/0000-0003-1208-4072
dc.authoridÖzcan, Mutlu/0000-0002-9623-6098
dc.authoridGozetici Cil, Burcu/0000-0002-8685-700X
dc.authorwosidGozukara Bag, Harika Gozde/ABG-7588-2020
dc.authorwosidÖzcan, Mutlu/B-2862-2013
dc.authorwosidGozetici Cil, Burcu/L-8341-2018
dc.contributor.authorOztuerk-Bozkurt, Funda
dc.contributor.authorToz-Akalin, Tugba
dc.contributor.authorGozetici, Burcu
dc.contributor.authorKusdemir, Mahmut
dc.contributor.authorOzsoy, Alev
dc.contributor.authorGozukara-Bag, Harika
dc.contributor.authorOzcan, Mutlu
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:41:38Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:41:38Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThis study evaluated the load-bearing capacity of premolars restored with three types of resin composite materials in mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) cavities. Extracted human premolars (N=30, n=10 per group) were randomly divided into three groups; MOD cavities were prepared and restored with one of the following resin materials: Group BFC: Bulk-fill composite (SonicFill, Kerr Corporation), Group NC: Nanohybrid resin composite (Filtek Z550, 3M ESPE), Group SC: Silorane-based composite (Filtek Silorane, 3M ESPE). For NC Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray, Japan) and for SC, Silorane adhesive resin (Filtek Silorane System Adhesive, 3M ESPE) were used. The cavities in NC and SC groups were restored incrementally, while those in BFC groups were restored in bulk. After water storage (24h, 37 degrees C), each tooth was subjected to compressive loading with a stainless steel ball (diameter: 4mm) perpendicular to the occlusal surface (1mm/min). Failure types were categorized according to being repairable or irrepairable. Data were statistically analysed using Kruskal-Wallis test (=0.05). Two-parameter Weibull distribution values including the Weibull modulus, scale (m) and shape (0) values were calculated. Fracture resistance of premolars restored with BFC (829.84), NC (701.35) and SC (807.73) did not show significant difference (p=0.72). Weibull distribution presented lower shape (0) for SC (m=2.77) and NC (m=3.09) compared to BFC (m=5.01). The incidence of repairable failures was more common in BFC (80%) compared to NC (60%) and SC (50%). Adhesive failures were more often observed in NC (80%) and SC (70%) groups.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01694243.2016.1168340
dc.identifier.endpage1890en_US
dc.identifier.issn0169-4243
dc.identifier.issn1568-5616
dc.identifier.issue17en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84962388463en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1880en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2016.1168340
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/97251
dc.identifier.volume30en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000374585600004en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Adhesion Science and Technologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAdhesionen_US
dc.subjectbulk-fill resinen_US
dc.subjectfracture resistanceen_US
dc.subjectnanohybriden_US
dc.subjectresin compositeen_US
dc.subjectsiloraneen_US
dc.subjectSonicFillen_US
dc.titleLoad-bearing capacity and failure types of premolars restored with sonic activated bulk-fill-, nano-hybrid and silorane-based resin restorative materialsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu