Comparison of Standard and Modified Standard Organ Procurement Techniques for Deceased Donors

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridYilmaz, Sezai/0000-0002-8044-0297
dc.authoridAkbulut, Sami/0000-0002-6864-7711;
dc.authorwosidYilmaz, Sezai/ABI-2323-2020
dc.authorwosidAkbulut, Sami/L-9568-2014
dc.authorwosidKoc, Cemalettin/B-6430-2018
dc.contributor.authorKoc, Cemalettin
dc.contributor.authorAkbulut, Sami
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Sezai
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:49:13Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:49:13Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This study aimed to compare the impact of deceased-donor organ procurement techniques (standard versus modified standard) on biochemical outcomes after liver transplant. Materials and Methods: From February 2006 to December 2013, organs were recovered from 105 consecutive deceased donors by our transplant team. All organ procurement procedures were performed by a pioneer surgeon experienced in organ recovery from deceased donors. Donors were divided into those who had the abdominothoracic approach, which is referred to as the standard technique, and those who had the abdominal approach, which is referred to as the modified standard technique. Both groups were compared in terms of age, sex, weight, height, body mass index, liver graft weight, cross-clamping time, cold ischemia time, and liver function tests in recipients over the first 3 postoperative days. Results: Our study group included 66 male and 39 female donors, with an age range of 1 to 93 years (median of 44 y, means +/- standard deviation of 43.8 +/- 23.7 y). Among the deceased donors, 73 underwent the modified standard technique and 32 underwent the standard technique. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in terms of age, sex, weight, height, body mass index, graft weight, cold ischemia time, and liver function tests in recipients over the first 3 postoperative days. We observed a statistically significant difference between groups in terms of cross-clamping time (P < .001). Conclusions: Except for the decreased cross-clamping time, the modified standard technique for deceased organ retrieval had no effect on clinical outcomes in recipients after liver transplant. However, this retrospective study requires additional prospective investigations to more fully understand the differences.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.6002/ect.2018.0022
dc.identifier.endpage795en_US
dc.identifier.issn1304-0855
dc.identifier.issn2146-8427
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.pmid30398097en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85098925892en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage791en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.6002/ect.2018.0022
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/99701
dc.identifier.volume18en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000597949300007en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBaskent Univen_US
dc.relation.ispartofExperimental and Clinical Transplantationen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectDeceased-donor liver transplantationen_US
dc.subjectModified standard organ procurement techniqueen_US
dc.subjectStandard organ procurement techniqueen_US
dc.titleComparison of Standard and Modified Standard Organ Procurement Techniques for Deceased Donorsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu