Comparation of failure criterions for pin loaded composite plates under fatigue loads

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorParlamis, Abdulkerim
dc.contributor.authorKaman, Mete Onur
dc.contributor.authorOrcen, Gurbet
dc.contributor.authorAlbayrak, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorErdem, Serkan
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-04T13:33:15Z
dc.date.available2026-04-04T13:33:15Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractIn this study, the behavior of circular perforated and pin-loaded models of laminated composites under cyclic loads was obtained by progressive damage analysis. Experimental studies were also carried out to verify the numerical results the specimens. The strength and stiffness changes of the experimental specimens were obtained, and residual strength and stiffness graphs, which changed according to the number of cycles, were created. These parameters were used in the progressive damage analysis. In the numerical study, Hashin Damage Criterion was used for progressive damage analysis and the results were also compared with Puck Damage Criterion. Different damage criteria and problem types can be solved under fatigue load with the help of the subprogram written in ANSYS APDL. In this direction, after the verification of the numerical study with the experimental study, a parametric study was also carried out for the numerical analysis. At high cycle numbers for low loads in the experiments, crushing damage around the hole and shear damage at the plate edge became evident along with matrix damage. This damage behavior was consistent with the analyses performed with Puck. In the Hashin damage criterion, fiber compression damages were dominant, especially on the pin contact surface around the hole.
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) [122M786]
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was supported by Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) under the Grant Number 122M786 The authors thank to TUBITAK for their supports.
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/00219983251369740
dc.identifier.issn0021-9983
dc.identifier.issn1530-793X
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-2504-0135
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-2913-6652
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-8329-8142
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105024347059
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/00219983251369740
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/109036
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001557074000001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSage Publications Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Composite Materials
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250329
dc.subjectfatigue
dc.subjectprogressive failure analysis
dc.subjectHashin failure criteria
dc.subjectpuck failure criteria
dc.subjectpin load
dc.titleComparation of failure criterions for pin loaded composite plates under fatigue loads
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu