The incidence of canine transmigration and tooth impaction in a Turkish subpopulation

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridakgünlü, faruk/0000-0002-3427-1381
dc.authorwosidakgünlü, faruk/GLS-0679-2022
dc.contributor.authorAktan, Ali Murat
dc.contributor.authorKara, Sami
dc.contributor.authorAkgunlu, Faruk
dc.contributor.authorMalkoc, Siddik
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:32:33Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:32:33Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of transmigrated maxillary and mandibular canine teeth and also of the other impacted teeth in a Turkish subpopulation. Five thousand consecutive panoramic radiographs taken of patients who attended the Department of Oral Diagnosis and Radiology, Selcuk University, for routine examination between 2005 and 2007 were examined to identify incidences of transmigrated and impacted teeth. Demographic information of all patients was also recorded. Transmigrations were categorized according to the classification of Mupparapu. The effect of age, gender, and sidedness (left or right side) on the recorded abnormality was evaluated using a t-test. The incidence of transmigrated upper and lower canine teeth was found to be 0.34 per cent [17 patients, 12 females/5 males, with a mean age of 34 years (range 16-76 years)] and 0.14 per cent [7 patients, 4 females/3 males, with a mean age of 37.1 years (range 17-62 years)]. The incidence of tooth impaction was 2.94 per cent [147 patients, 101 females/46 males, with a mean age of 29.7 years (range 15-80 years)]. The most frequently impacted tooth was the upper canine followed by the lower canine, lower second premolar, and upper second premolar. No incidence of maxillary first molar impaction was found. Gender and sidedness did not show a statistical significance on the recorded abnormality (P = 0.22 and P = 0.48, respectively). However, in the 15-29 year age group, this was statistically different (P < 0.05). The incidence of transmigration of impacted mandibular canine teeth was greater than other teeth. With the increased use of panoramic radiographs, it is inevitable that diagnosis of such anomalies will increase.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ejo/cjp151
dc.identifier.endpage581en_US
dc.identifier.issn0141-5387
dc.identifier.issn1460-2210
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.pmid20237077en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-77957817434en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage575en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjp151
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/95159
dc.identifier.volume32en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000282426900015en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOxford Univ Pressen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Orthodonticsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectMandibular Caninesen_US
dc.subjectIntraosseous Transmigrationen_US
dc.subjectMigrationen_US
dc.subjectPatienten_US
dc.titleThe incidence of canine transmigration and tooth impaction in a Turkish subpopulationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu