Comparison of HDL Coder and System Generator Tools in terms of QPSK Analysis

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridTağluk, M. Emin/0000-0001-7789-6376
dc.authoridisik, ibrahim/0000-0003-1355-9420
dc.authorwosidTağluk, M. Emin/ABH-1005-2020
dc.authorwosidisik, ibrahim/AAG-5915-2019
dc.contributor.authorIsik, Ibrahim
dc.contributor.authorTagluk, Mehmet Emin
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:44:14Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:44:14Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description2017 International Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing Symposium (IDAP) -- SEP 16-17, 2017 -- Malatya, TURKEYen_US
dc.description.abstractBER (bit error rate) measurement is an important criterion to analyze digital communication systems. In literature this measurement generally performed through simulation programs like Matlab/Simulink. It is considered that the simulation programs may not represent a real communication system and also they are quite time consuming and expensive. However, modeling communication systems with parallel processing and fast modules such as FPGA (Field Programmable Gate Arrays) using VHDL (Very High Speed Integrated Circuit Hardware Description Language) and performing BER measurements on this modules is much faster, closer to the reality. The main interest of this study is to demonstrate the performance of FPGA based models in communication systems and show their advantages and disadvantages compared to the simulator models. Despite the simple structure of FPGA it sometimes restricts a complete design of the system because of comprising only gates, logic operators, register etc. Simulator models such as the ones designed with Matlab have a huge library which provides flexibility in the design and analysis of the system. Software and hardware developers try to develop new ways such as HDL Coder and System Generator tools to get over these restrictions. But both methods still have some restrictions to design a better communication system. In this paper also this restrictions are investigated detailed. As an example, QPSK (Quadrature Phase Shift Keying) modulation is shown by using System Generator tool in this paper.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipIEEE Turkey Sect,Anatolian Scien_US
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific And Technological Research Council Of Turkey, TUBITAK [115E663]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study is supported by The Scientific And Technological Research Council Of Turkey, TUBITAK (no: 115E663)en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-5386-1880-6
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85039923287en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/98099
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000426868700141en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIeeeen_US
dc.relation.ispartof2017 International Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing Symposium (Idap)en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectFPGAen_US
dc.subjectQPSK Modulationen_US
dc.subjectVHDLen_US
dc.subjectHDL Coderen_US
dc.subjectSystem Generatoren_US
dc.titleComparison of HDL Coder and System Generator Tools in terms of QPSK Analysisen_US
dc.typeConference Objecten_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu